Why the study?
Does programming a single VF zone of ≤270 ms reduce inappropriate ICD shocks in patients with Brugada syndrome, early repolarization syndrome, or idiopathic ventricular fibrillation?
Does programming a single VF zone of ≤270 ms reduce inappropriate ICD shocks in patients with Brugada syndrome, early repolarization syndrome, or idiopathic ventricular fibrillation?
Programming a single VF zone of ≤270 ms in patients with primary electrical disorders may significantly reduce inappropriate ICD shocks with a minimal risk of missing appropriate therapies.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support single VF zone ≤270 ms programming to reduce inappropriate shocks in primary electrical disorders; leaves open prospective validation.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are indicated in patients with Brugada syndrome (BS), early repolarization syndrome (ERS), or idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (IVF) who are at high risk for sudden cardiac death. The optimal ICD programming for reducing inappropriate shocks in these patients remains to be determined. We investigated the difference in the mean cycle length of tachyarrhythmias that activated either appropriate or inappropriate ICD shocks in these three patient groups to determine the optimal ventricular fibrillation (VF) zone for minimizing inappropriate ICD shocks. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We selected 41 patients (35 men) (mean age±standard deviation=42.6±13.0 year) who received ICD shocks between April 1996 and April 2014 to treat BS (n=24), ERS (n=9), or IVF (n=8). Clinical and ICD interrogation data were retrospectively collected and analyzed for all events with ICD shocks. RESULTS: Of the 244 episodes, 180 (73.8%) shocks were appropriate and 64 (26.2%) were inappropriate. The mean cycle lengths of the tachyarrhythmias that activated appropriate and inappropriate shocks were 178.9±28.7 ms and 284.8±24.4 ms, respectively (p<0.001). The cutoff value with the highest sensitivity and specificity for discriminating between appropriate and inappropriate shocks was 235 ms (sensitivity, 98.4%; specificity, 95.6%). When we programmed a single VF zone of ≤270 ms, inappropriate ICD shocks were reduced by 70.5% and appropriate shocks were missed in 1.7% of these patients. CONCLUSION: Programming of a single VF zone of ≤270 ms in patients with BS, ERS, or IVF could reduce inappropriate ICD shocks, with a low risk of missing appropriate shocks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: