Key result
Cardiac computed tomography accurately characterized quadricuspid aortic valve morphology and demonstrated an excellent correlation (r = 0.99) with cardiac magnetic resonance for quantifying aortic regurgitation.
Why the study?
Does cardiac computed tomography provide accurate morphological and functional evaluation of quadricuspid aortic valves compared to TTE and CMR?
Observational (n=11)
No
Does cardiac computed tomography provide accurate morphological and functional evaluation of quadricuspid aortic valves compared to TTE and CMR?
Cardiac computed tomography provides accurate anatomical and functional assessment of quadricuspid aortic valves, correlating highly with CMR for regurgitant severity.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify the morphological and functional characteristics of quadricuspid aortic valves (QAV) on cardiac computed tomography (CCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 11 patients with QAV. All patients underwent CCT and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), and 7 patients underwent cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). The presence and classification of QAV assessed by CCT was compared with that of TTE and intraoperative findings. The regurgitant orifice area (ROA) measured by CCT was compared with severity of aortic regurgitation (AR) by TTE and the regurgitant fraction (RF) by CMR. RESULTS: All of the patients had AR; 9 had pure AR, 1 had combined aortic stenosis and regurgitation, and 1 had combined subaortic stenosis and regurgitation. Two patients had a subaortic fibrotic membrane and 1 of them showed a subaortic stenosis. One QAV was misdiagnosed as tricuspid aortic valve on TTE. In accordance with the Hurwitz and Robert's classification, consensus was reached on the QAV classification between the CCT and TTE findings in 7 of 10 patients. The patients were classified as type A (n = 1), type B (n = 3), type C (n = 1), type D (n = 4), and type F (n = 2) on CCT. A very high correlation existed between ROA by CCT and RF by CMR (r = 0.99) but a good correlation existed between ROA by CCT and regurgitant severity by TTE (r = 0.62). CONCLUSION: Cardiac computed tomography provides comprehensive anatomical and functional information about the QAV.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Song et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Quadricuspid aortic valve (QAV) (n=11). Cardiac computed tomography (CCT) vs. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) was evaluated on Correlation between regurgitant orifice area by CCT and regurgitant fraction by CMR (r = 0.99, p=0.015). Cardiac computed tomography accurately characterized quadricuspid aortic valve morphology and demonstrated an excellent correlation (r = 0.99) with cardiac magnetic resonance for quantifying aortic regurgitation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: