Why the study?
Does RWJ-22108 inhibit voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels in porcine tracheal smooth muscle cells compared to nicardipine and verapamil?
Does RWJ-22108 inhibit voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels in porcine tracheal smooth muscle cells compared to nicardipine and verapamil?
RWJ-22108 inhibits voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels in tracheal smooth muscle similarly to nicardipine but with a greater stabilizing effect on the inactivated channel state.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No immediate clinical use in humans; leaves open further development of RWJ-22108 from porcine models.
We compared electrophysiological effects of the bronchoselective Ca2+ channel antagonist RWJ-22108 on voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels (VDCs) of porcine tracheal smooth muscle cells to the effects of nicardipine and verapamil. 2. Each of the three Ca2+ channel antagonists tested inhibited inward Ca2+ currents (ICa) measured by whole-cell patch clamp techniques. Inhibition was dose-dependent with approximately 50% inhibition of peak ICa at +20 mV obtained with 3 x 10(-6) M RWJ-22108, 3 x 10(-7) M nicardipine, or 10(-5) M verapamil. 3. Both RWJ-22108 (3 x 10(-6) M) and nicardipine (3 x 10(-7) M) shifted the voltage dependence of steady-state inactivation to more negative potentials; however, the change in the potential of half-maximal inactivation induced by RWJ-22108 (-18 mV) was significantly greater than that induced by nicardipine (-12 mV). Verapamil did not alter the voltage dependence of inactivation. 4. We conclude that inhibition of VDCs by RWJ-22108 is qualitatively similar to that by nicardipine but with a greater stabilizing effect on the inactivated channel state.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yamakage et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: