Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this discussion of Amy Schwartz Cooney’s paper (this issue) I focus on the current interest in relational theorizing on the analyst’s proactive role vis-à-vis her patient, that is, what she actually does for or gives to her patient. I consider the role of the analyst’s own internal “bad” objects in facilitating or inhibiting the therapeutic process. I end with a set of theoretical propositions about the ways in which an intense and deadening shame can lead to dissociation and/or repression of hopeful fantasies about the future.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jody Messler Davies (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: