Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article critiques DiCristina's (1977) JCJE article concerning the quantitative emphasis in criminal justice curriculums. I argue that he (1) overlooked one of the more profound merits associated with quantitative research when he proposed that both methods should receive equal attention, (2) underestimated the contribution quantitative methods have made to policy, and (3) confused theoretical problems with methodological problems when he evaluated the connection between quantitative methodology and crime control policy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
John Worrall (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: