Why the study?
Does a monitor with integrated atrial fibrillation recognition software improve the early detection of atrial fibrillation in patients with acute stroke or TIA compared to standard monitoring?
Does a monitor with integrated atrial fibrillation recognition software improve the early detection of atrial fibrillation in patients with acute stroke or TIA compared to standard monitoring?
The use of a 12-lead ECG monitor with integrated atrial fibrillation recognition software significantly increased the detection rate of AF compared to standard 3-lead monitoring in acute stroke patients.
May support higher AF detection with integrated software in acute stroke; leaves open need for RCTs before practice change.
INTRODUCTION: It is unknown whether monitors that include atrial fibrillation recognition software (AF-RS) increase the rate of early atrial fibrillation (AF) detection in acute stroke. We aimed to evaluate the AF detection rate of an AF-RS monitor and compare it with standard monitoring. METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-centre observational study conducted on consecutive patients with acute transient ischaemic attack or brain infarction attended in a stroke unit (SU) with six beds. Five beds had a standard monitor with a three-lead electrocardiogram (ECG)-tracing monitor that did not automatically detect AF, and one bed had a 12-lead ECG monitor with integrated AF-RS. All patients were monitored for at least 24 h and underwent a daily ECG during their stay in the SU. In case of unknown stroke aetiology, the patients underwent 24 h Holter monitoring. RESULTS: A total of 76 patients were included: 59 patients in the standard monitor group and 17 patients in the AF-RS monitor group. The mean age was 72.11 (±13.09) years, and 59.2% were men. A total of 20 new cases of AF were identified. The AF-RS monitor showed a higher rate of AF detection than the standard devices (57.1% vs 7.7%, p=0.031). The AF-RS monitor showed sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive values of 57.1%, 100%, 100% and 76.9%, respectively. For the standard monitors, these values were 7.7%, 100%, 100% and 79.3%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The monitor with AF-RS demonstrated a higher detection rate for AF than standard ECG monitoring in acute stroke patients in a SU.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arévalo-Manso et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: