Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates improved CH4 yield and selectivity in photocatalytic CO2 reduction, indicating effective catalyst design.
In this study, a novel Pt-loaded CuPc/g-C 3 N 4 (PtCuCN) composite was synthesized for the selective photocatalytic reduction of CO 2 to CH 4 under visible light. The PtCuCN catalyst achieved a CH 4 yield of 39.8 μmol g −1 h −1 , significantly outperforming bulk g–C 3 N 4 and CuPc alone by factors of 2.5 and 3.1, respectively, with a high selectivity of 90%. In comparison with other commonly studied photocatalysts, such as g–C 3 N 4 –based catalysts, the PtCuCN composite exhibited superior CH 4 yield and product selectivity, demonstrating its potential as a more efficient photocatalyst for CO 2 reduction. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), density functional theory (DFT) calculations, and in-situ infrared (IR) analysis revealed that the Pt 0 species effectively lower the activation energy for CH 4 formation, while CuPc extends the light absorption range and enhances charge separation. The combined effects of these components in a Z-scheme heterojunction provide new insights into designing highly selective CO 2 -to-CH 4 photocatalysts. This work demonstrates the potential of PtCuCN as a highly efficient and stable catalyst for CO 2 reduction to CH 4 under visible light. • A novel Pt-loaded CuPc/g-C 3 N 4 (PtCuCN) composite was synthesized for efficient CO 2 reduction to CH 4 under visible light. • The Z-scheme heterojunction between CuPc and g-C 3 N 4 improves light absorption and charge separation, minimizing electron–hole recombination. • Pt 0 species on PtCuCN serve as active sites that lower the free energy barrier for CH 4 formation, enhancing selectivity and yield.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: