Key result
Bicuspid aortic valve repair combined with root remodeling demonstrated excellent long-term durability, achieving a 20-year survival of 76.9% and freedom from reoperation of 76.6%.
Why the study?
When aortic dilatation involves the root in bicuspid aortic valves, valve-preserving root replacement is a treatment option; this study reviews a 25-year institutional experience with root remodeling.
Cohort (n=472)
No
Bicuspid aortic valve repair combined with root remodeling provides excellent long-term durability, with 76.6% freedom from reoperation at 20 years, though cusp calcification and pericardial patch use increase the risk of valve failure.
Supports valve-sparing repair with root remodeling in selected bicuspid cases; leaves open randomized comparisons to replacement.
Background: Bicuspid aortic valves may be associated with ascending aortic aneurysm, or develop severe aortic regurgitation with variable aortic dilatation. If aortic dilatation involves the root, valve-preserving root replacement is a treatment option, and we prefer root remodeling for this purpose. The objective of this study is to review our experience encompassing 25 years. Methods: Between November 1995 and August 2021, 472 patients (429 male; age 9-80 years; mean 48±13 years) were treated by bicuspid aortic valve repair and root remodeling. Aortic regurgitation was present in 322 cases. The primary indication for surgery was aortic regurgitation (n=317), aortic aneurysm (n=143) or acute type A aortic dissection (n=12). In 271 instances, a suture annuloplasty was added. Cusp calcification was present beyond the raphe in 80 cases, and a pericardial patch was used for partial cusp replacement in 44 cases. Follow-up was 92.8% complete with a mean of 71±68 months (median 61 months). Results: Hospital mortality was 0.4% and survival at 20 years was 76.9%. Reoperation was necessary for recurrent aortic regurgitation in 26 patients; nine patients underwent reoperation for stenosis. The overall freedom of reoperation was 90.5% after ten years and 76.6% after 20 years. Annuloplasty was associated with a higher proportion of competent aortic valves at discharge (P=0.001), and had no effect on ten-year freedom from reoperation. The use of a pericardial patch for cusp repair was a predictor for reoperation (P=0.003). The presence of cusp calcification was a predictor for the development of aortic stenosis and reoperation (P=0.032). Conclusions: Bicuspid aortic valve repair combined with root remodeling leads to excellent ten- and 20-year results. Cusp calcification and partial cusp replacement are associated with an increased probability of valve failure requiring reoperation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Froede et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Bicuspid aortic valve with aortic regurgitation or aneurysm (n=472). Bicuspid aortic valve repair and root remodeling was evaluated on Freedom from reoperation at 20 years. Bicuspid aortic valve repair combined with root remodeling demonstrated excellent long-term durability, achieving a 20-year survival of 76.9% and freedom from reoperation of 76.6%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: