Key result
Root remodeling demonstrated a 94% freedom from reoperation at 15 years in patients with tricuspid aortic valves, which was significantly higher than the 84% observed in patients with bicuspid valves.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to summarize 28 years of clinical experience with root remodeling as a valve-preserving root replacement technique for aortic regurgitation and root aneurysm.
Does root remodeling provide durable long-term outcomes in patients with aortic regurgitation and root aneurysm?
Cohort (n=1,189)
No
Does root remodeling provide durable long-term outcomes in patients with aortic regurgitation and root aneurysm?
Absolute Event Rate: 94% vs 84%
p-value: p=<0.001
Root remodeling is a viable and durable option for valve-preserving root replacement, with excellent long-term freedom from reoperation, particularly in patients with tricuspid aortic valves.
Supports root remodeling durability in aortic regurgitation; leaves open randomized confirmation versus replacement.
Background: Root remodeling is one form of valve-preserving root replacement for aortic regurgitation and root aneurysm. The objective of this review was to summarize our experience with root remodeling encompassing 28 years. Methods: We performed root remodeling in 1,189 patients (76% male, mean age 53±14 years) between October 1995 and September 2022. The original valve morphology was unicuspid in 33 (2%), bicuspid in 472 (40%) and tricuspid in 684 (58%) patients. Fifty-four patients (5%) had Marfan's syndrome. Objective measurement of valve configuration was performed in 804 (77%) and an external suture annuloplasty was added in 524 patients (44%). Cusp repair was performed in 1,047 (88%) patients, most commonly for prolapse (n=972; 82%). Mean follow-up was 6.7±5.5 years [1 month to 28 years]. Follow-up was 95% complete (7,700 patient-years). Results: Survival was 71% at 20 years; freedom from cardiac death was 80%. Freedom from aortic regurgitation ≥2 was 77% at 15 years. Freedom from reoperation was 89% and was higher in tricuspid aortic valves (94%) compared to bicuspid (84%) and unicuspid valves (P<0.001). Since the introduction of effective height measurement, freedom from reoperation has remained stable at 15 years (91%). With the addition of a suture annuloplasty, freedom from reoperation was 94% at 12 years. The difference with or without annuloplasty (91%) was not significant (P=0.949). Conclusions: Root remodeling is a viable option in valve-preserving root replacement. Concomitant cusp prolapse is frequent and can be corrected reproducibly by intraoperative measurement of effective height. The long-term benefit of an annuloplasty still needs to be defined.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abeln et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Aortic regurgitation and root aneurysm (n=1,189). Root remodeling in tricuspid aortic valves vs. Root remodeling in bicuspid aortic valves was evaluated on Freedom from reoperation at 15 years (p=<0.001). Root remodeling demonstrated a 94% freedom from reoperation at 15 years in patients with tricuspid aortic valves, which was significantly higher than the 84% observed in patients with bicuspid valves.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: