Key result
Aortic valve-sparing operations yielded 97.8% 5-year survival, with 5-year freedom from re-operation of 100% for BAV, 98% for TAV with <severe AR, and 82.7% for TAV with severe AR (p=0.07).
Why the study?
Does root replacement with aortic valve-sparing provide acceptable survival and freedom from re-operation in patients with bicuspid aortic valves or severe aortic regurgitation?
Population
102 patients undergoing aortic valve-sparing procedures for ascending aortic aneurysm or dissection…
Comparison
Root replacement with aortic valve-sparing. vs Comparison among three groups based on baseline…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
5 years
Authors
Loading...
Supports valve-sparing root replacement in BAV and severe AR; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
Cohort (n=102)
Does root replacement with aortic valve-sparing provide acceptable survival and freedom from re-operation in patients with bicuspid aortic valves or severe aortic regurgitation?
Absolute Event Rate: 82.7% vs 98%
p-value: p=0.07
Root replacement with aortic valve-sparing offers excellent survival and acceptable re-operation rates even in patients with bicuspid aortic valves or severe aortic regurgitation.
Badiu et al. (2010) conducted a cohort in Ascending aortic aneurysm or dissection with bicuspid aortic valve or severe aortic regurgitation (n=102). Aortic valve-sparing procedures in severe AR or BAV vs. Tricuspid aortic valve with less than severe AR was evaluated on Actuarial 5-year freedom from aortic valve-related re-operation (p=0.07). Aortic valve-sparing operations yielded 97.8% 5-year survival, with 5-year freedom from re-operation of 100% for BAV, 98% for TAV with <severe AR, and 82.7% for TAV with severe AR (p=0.07).
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: