Key result
Negative performance feedback during the PASAT elicited significantly larger neural activation across multiple processing stages (FRN, P300, LPP) compared to positive feedback.
Why the study?
The neural mechanisms underlying the processing of continuous performance feedback alongside high task-load in the paced auditory serial addition task were unclear.
Does performance feedback in the PASAT task elicit stage-dependent neural activation associated with cognitive functioning in healthy participants?
Cross-Sectional (n=24)
No
Does performance feedback in the PASAT task elicit stage-dependent neural activation associated with cognitive functioning in healthy participants?
Increased early neural responses (FRN) to negative feedback signify distraction and poorer performance, whereas higher activity at later stages (P300, LPP) reflects cognitive control processes to preserve ongoing performance.
Stage-dependent ERPs to feedback may index distraction versus control in healthy adults; leaves open clinical translation.
Research on cognitive control has sparked increasing interest in recent years, as it is an important prerequisite for goal oriented human behavior. The paced auditory serial addition task (PASAT) has been used to test and train cognitive control functions. This adaptive, challenging task includes continuous performance feedback. Therefore, additional cognitive control capacities are required to process this information along with the already high task-load. The underlying neural mechanisms, however, are still unclear. To explore the neural signatures of the PASAT and particularly the processing of distractive feedback information, feedback locked event-related potentials were derived from 24 healthy participants during an adaptive 2-back version of the PASAT. Larger neural activation after negative feedback was found for feedback related negativity (FRN), P300, and late positive potential (LPP). In early stages of feedback processing (i.e., FRN), a larger difference between positive and negative feedback responses was associated with poorer overall performance. This association was inverted in later stages (i.e., P300 and LPP). Together, our findings indicate stage-dependent associations between neural activation after negative information and cognitive functioning. Conceivably, increased early responses to negative feedback signify distraction, whereas higher activity at later stages reflects cognitive control processes to preserve ongoing performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sommer et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy (n=24). Negative performance feedback vs. Positive performance feedback was evaluated on Feedback related negativity (FRN) mean amplitude (200-300 ms post feedback) (p=0.014). Negative performance feedback during the PASAT elicited significantly larger neural activation across multiple processing stages (FRN, P300, LPP) compared to positive feedback.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: