Key result
Intraoperative left atrial epicardial cryoablation during coronary artery bypass surgery significantly increased the proportion of patients in sinus rhythm at 22 months to 63%, compared to 34% with surgery alone.
Why the study?
Does intraoperative left atrial epicardial cryoablation improve rhythm outcome and affect cardiac function in patients with coronary artery disease and atrial fibrillation undergoing CABG?
Case-Control (n=70)
Single-blind (outcome assessors)
No
Does intraoperative left atrial epicardial cryoablation improve rhythm outcome and affect cardiac function in patients with coronary artery disease and atrial fibrillation undergoing CABG?
Concomitant epicardial left atrial cryoablation during CABG significantly increases the proportion of patients in sinus rhythm at approximately 2 years, though it is associated with mild decreases in atrial and ventricular function.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support cryoablation for sinus rhythm after CABG with AF; leaves open net benefit given functional changes and needs RCTs.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of intraoperative left atrial epicardial cryoablation on rhythm and atrial and ventricular function. DESIGN: Thirty five patients with coronary artery disease and documented atrial fibrillation underwent coronary artery bypass surgery and concomitant cryoablation. An age and gender matched control group of 35 patients with atrial fibrillation underwent bypass surgery alone. Echocardiography was performed 9 ? 32 days before and 22 ? 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: The proportion of patients in sinus rhythm at follow-up was 63% and 34% (p = 0.04) in the cryoablation and control groups, respectively. In patients with sinus rhythm both before surgery and at follow-up, the left atrial area increased (p = 0.002) and the mitral annular excursion during atrial contraction decreased (p = 0.01) after cryoablation. The mitral flow velocity during atrial systole decreased after cryoablation (p = 0.002). The LV diameter increased (p = 0.03) and the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) decreased (p = 0.03) in cryoablated but not in control patients. Continued deterioration was seen in patients with atrial fibrillation both pre- and postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: At long-term follow-up, a significantly higher proportion of patients was in sinus rhythm in the cryoablation than in the control group. The atrial and ventricular function had decreased at follow-up two years after surgery. This decrease was small and occurred within or close to the reference values in patients with sinus rhythm at follow-up, while patients remaining in atrial fibrillation showed a significant continued deterioration. Some subgroups were small, and the findings, although statistically significant, should be interpreted with caution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Johansson et al. (2011) conducted a case-control in Coronary artery disease and atrial fibrillation (n=70). Intraoperative left atrial epicardial cryoablation vs. Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) alone was evaluated on Proportion of patients in sinus rhythm at long-term follow-up (p=0.04). Intraoperative left atrial epicardial cryoablation during coronary artery bypass surgery significantly increased the proportion of patients in sinus rhythm at 22 months to 63%, compared to 34% with surgery alone.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: