Key result
Subclinical cardiovascular disease increased the overall risk of cognitive impairment (RR 1.21; 95% CI 1.03-1.44), an effect that was not mediated by incident clinical cardiovascular disease.
Why the study?
How vascular risk factors contribute to cognitive impairment remains an open question, specifically whether subclinical cardiovascular disease affects cognitive impairment risk through incident clinical cardiovascular disease.
Does subclinical cardiovascular disease increase the risk of cognitive impairment, and is this mediated by incident clinically manifested cardiovascular disease?
Cohort
Does subclinical cardiovascular disease increase the risk of cognitive impairment, and is this mediated by incident clinically manifested cardiovascular disease?
Relative Risk: 1.21 (95% CI 1.03–1.44)
Subclinical cardiovascular disease increases the risk of cognitive impairment, but this effect is not primarily mediated by the development of clinically manifested cardiovascular disease.
Subclinical CVD was associated with cognitive impairment independent of clinical events; leaves open direct pathways requiring prospective confirmation.
BACKGROUND: An important epidemiological question is understanding how vascular risk factors contribute to cognitive impairment. Using data from the Cardiovascular Health Cognition Study, we investigated how subclinical cardiovascular disease (sCVD) relates to cognitive impairment risk and the extent to which the hypothesized risk is mediated by the incidence of clinically manifested cardiovascular disease (CVD), both overall and within apolipoprotein E-4 (APOE-4) subgroups. METHODS: We adopted a novel "separable effects" causal mediation framework that assumes that sCVD has separably intervenable atherosclerosis-related components. We then ran several mediation models, adjusting for key covariates. RESULTS: We found that sCVD increased overall risk of cognitive impairment (risk ratio [RR] = 1.21, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03, 1.44); however, there was little or no mediation by incident clinically manifested CVD (indirect effect RR = 1.02, 95% CI: 1.00, 1.03). We also found attenuated effects among APOE-4 carriers (total effect RR = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.81, 1.47; indirect effect RR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.96, 1.01) and stronger findings among noncarriers (total effect RR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.60; indirect effect RR = 1.02, 95% CI: 1.00, 1.05). In secondary analyses restricting cognitive impairment to only incident dementia cases, we found similar effect patterns. CONCLUSIONS: We found that the effect of sCVD on cognitive impairment does not seem to be mediated by CVD, both overall and within APOE-4 subgroups. Our results were critically assessed via sensitivity analyses, and they were found to be robust. Future work is needed to fully understand the relationship between sCVD, CVD, and cognitive impairment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andrews et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Cognitive impairment. Subclinical cardiovascular disease (sCVD) was evaluated on Cognitive impairment (RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.03, 1.44). Subclinical cardiovascular disease increased the overall risk of cognitive impairment (RR 1.21; 95% CI 1.03-1.44), an effect that was not mediated by incident clinical cardiovascular disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: