Rotational power losses per cycle P <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">r</inf> /f have been measured as a function of rotational frequency f, between about 0 and 25 Hz, on grain oriented and isotro pic 3% SiFe, under different magnetization conditions, up to almost complete saturation. Loss measurements were performed from the rate of change of the angular velocity of a top, spinning freely in a uniform magnetic field, on which disk samples (diameter 19 mm, thickness 0.33 ram) were mounted. Maximum losses are found to occur for a relative magnetization M/M <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">s</inf> , which is of the order of 0.8 for all rotational frequencies. The results show that the behavior of P <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">r</inf> /f vs. f is characterized by large excess anomalies with respect to classical losses, except for M/M <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">s</inf> close to 1.0. On the other hand, the nonlinearity anomaly, typical of alternating loss curves, is absent since the rotational losses per cycle are found to increase linearly with f for all M/M <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">s</inf> values.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cecchetti et al. (1978) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: