Key result
Trained soccer players demonstrated a statistically significant difference in heart rate and stroke volume compared to novice players.
Why the study?
Does training status affect heart rate and stroke volume in adolescent male soccer players?
Cross-Sectional (n=37)
No
Does training status affect heart rate and stroke volume in adolescent male soccer players?
Athletic training in adolescent soccer players is associated with significant physiological adaptations in heart rate and stroke volume.
No practice change for adolescent soccer training; hypothesis-generating for causal cardiac adaptations.
The study was proposed to compare the selected cardiovascular profiles between novice and trained soccer players. To achieve this purpose of the study, thirty-seven (37) male soccer players from Malappuram district in Kerala state in the age group of 14 through 18 years were selected as subjects. The selected subjects were confined to the categorization made on the basis of training status (novice and trained). The cardiovascular profiles chosen as criterion variables were heart rate and stroke volume. Echocardiography was used to assess the selected criterion variables by adopting standardized procedures. The data thus collected were statistically examined by applying independent sample T test to find out the significant variation between groups. The α value of 0.05 was set for statistical significance. The outcome of the study demonstrates the existence of significant difference between novice and trained soccer players on heart rate and stroke volume, and thereby it implies that the training status has a statistically significant influence on heart rate and stroke volume.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
M Elamaran (2014) reported a cross-sectional. Trained status vs. Novice status was evaluated on Heart rate and stroke volume. Trained soccer players demonstrated a statistically significant difference in heart rate and stroke volume compared to novice players.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: