This paper takes up some theoretical issues raised in Hatcher and Troyna's critical discussion (in this issue) of my work on education policy. I argue that many of their criticisms are misplaced and rest upon flaws and limitations in their own theoretical work. I suggest that they employ a set of unhelpful conceptual binaries in their discussion which, if they are allowed to stand, can serve only to stultify the further development of policy sociology. In particular, I take issue with Hatcher and Troyna's presentation of the theoretical stances of Althusser and Foucauk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stephen J. Ball (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: