Why the study?
Does short-term conjugated equine estrogen therapy improve endothelial function in healthy postmenopausal women?
Does short-term conjugated equine estrogen therapy improve endothelial function in healthy postmenopausal women?
Short-term administration of 0.625 mg conjugated equine estrogens for 28 days improves endothelial function in healthy postmenopausal women.
Short-term CEE improves endothelial function in healthy postmenopausal women; extends RCT evidence on estrogen's vascular effects.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of short-term hormone replacement therapy with 0.625 mg conjugated estrogens daily on endothelial function of healthy postmenopausal women, using flow-mediated dilation (FMD) of the brachial artery. METHODS: We performed a double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial over 3 years. Randomization was performed using computer-generated sorting. All participants were blinded to the use of conjugated equine estrogens (CEE) or placebo and FMD was assessed by a blinded examiner, before and after 28 days of medication. A total of 64 healthy postmenopausal women were selected and randomly assigned into two groups of treatment: 0.625 mg of CEE or placebo. RESULTS: FMD values were statistically different between the groups (p = 0.025): the group receiving CEE showed a FMD value of 0.011 compared to the placebo group (FMD = -0.082). The two groups were additionally evaluated for homogeneity through the Shapiro-Wilk test in respect to variables that could interfere with endothelial function such as age (p = 0.729), body mass index (p = 0.891), and time since menopause (p = 0.724). Other variables were excluded during selection of the participants such as chronic vascular conditions, smoking, and sedentary lifestyle. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that the administration of 0.625 mg CEE for 28 days is effective in improving vascular nitric oxide-dependent dilation assessed by FMD of the brachial artery in postmenopausal women. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01482416.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hurtado et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: