Key result
Non-invasive cardiac output monitoring determined optimum AV and VV delays that were confirmed by echocardiography in 85% and 83% of patients, respectively (P < 0.01).
Why the study?
Does non-invasive cardiac output monitoring (NICOM) reliably optimize atrio- and interventricular delays in patients with recent CRT implantation compared to echocardiography?
Observational (n=47)
Does non-invasive cardiac output monitoring (NICOM) reliably optimize atrio- and interventricular delays in patients with recent CRT implantation compared to echocardiography?
NICOM based on bioreactance is a reliable and simpler alternative to echocardiography for optimizing AV and VV delays in patients with CRT.
NICOM may simplify CRT optimization with high echo concordance; hypothesis-generating for outcomes versus echocardiography in randomized trials.
AIMS: Non-invasive cardiac output monitoring (NICOM) based on bio-reactance offers a portable method to assess ventricular function. Optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) by echocardiography is labour-intensive. We compared the ability of NICOM and echocardiography to facilitate optimum CRT device programming. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-seven patients in sinus rhythm were evaluated within 14 days of CRT implantation. The atrio- (AV) and interventricular (VV) delay intervals were incrementally adjusted and at each setting, NICOM and echocardiographic data were recorded. Left ventricular (LV) volumes and function were assessed by echocardiography at baseline and 3 months. Response to CRT was defined as a reduction in LV end-systolic volume (LVESV) by >15%. In all patients, cardiac output (CO) increased significantly at optimized settings compared with baseline (5.66 +/- 1.4 vs. 4.35 +/- 1.1 L/min, P < 0.001). A 20% increase in acute CO following CRT predicted LVESV reduction of >15% with a sensitivity of 81% and specificity of 92% (AUC 0.86). The optimum AV delay determined by NICOM was confirmed by echocardiography in 40 of 47 patients (85%, r = 0.89, P < 0.01) and for VV delay in 39 of 47 patients (83%, r = 0.89, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Non-invasive cardiac output monitoring is a simple, reliable, and portable alternative to echocardiography to program CRT devices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khan et al. (2009) conducted an observational in Heart failure requiring cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) (n=47). Non-invasive cardiac output monitoring (NICOM) vs. Echocardiography was evaluated on Optimum AV delay determination confirmed by echocardiography (r = 0.89, p=< 0.01). Non-invasive cardiac output monitoring determined optimum AV and VV delays that were confirmed by echocardiography in 85% and 83% of patients, respectively (P < 0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: