Key result
NICOM-based optimization of CRT devices resulted in higher left ventricular ejection fraction and lower end-systolic volume compared to empiric settings.
Why the study?
Does CRT optimization using noninvasive cardiac output measurement improve LV volumes and function in patients undergoing CRT?
Cohort (n=203)
Does CRT optimization using noninvasive cardiac output measurement improve LV volumes and function in patients undergoing CRT?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CRT optimization using noninvasive cardiac output measurement improves clinical and echocardiographic responses compared to empiric out-of-the-box settings.
AIMS: Noninvasive cardiac output (CO) measurement (NICOM) is a novel method to assess ventricular function and offers a potential alternative for optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices. We compared the effect of NICOM-based optimization to no optimization (empiric settings) on CRT outcomes. METHODS: Two hundred and three patients undergoing CRT were assessed in two consecutive nonrandomized groups; an empiric group (n = 54) was programmed to "out of the box" settings with a fixed AV delay of 120 ms and a VV delay of 0 ms; and the optimization group (n = 149) underwent adjustments of both the AV and VV delays according to the greatest improvement in resting CO. The primary endpoints were improvements in left ventricular (LV) volumes and function from baseline at 6 months. Secondary endpoints were change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, quality of life score, and 6-minute walk test (6 MWT) performance. RESULTS: After 6 months of CRT, the optimization group had a better clinical response with lower NYHA class (2.1 ± 0.8 vs 2.4 ± 0.8, P = 0.048) and quality of life scores (35 ± 18 vs 42 ± 20, P = 0.045) but no differences in 6-MWT performance (269 ± 110 vs 277 ± 114 m, P = 0.81). Echocardiographic response was also better in the optimization group with lower LV end systolic volume (108 ± 51 vs 126 ± 60 mL, P = 0.048) and higher ejection fraction (30 ± 7 vs 27 ± 8, P = 0.01) compared to empiric settings. CONCLUSION: Device optimization using noninvasive measures of CO is associated with better clinical and echocardiographic response compared to empiric settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khan et al. (2011) conducted a cohort in Heart failure requiring cardiac resynchronization therapy (n=203). NICOM-based optimization vs. Empiric settings (no optimization) was evaluated on Improvements in left ventricular (LV) volumes and function from baseline at 6 months (p=0.048 for LVESV, 0.01 for EF). NICOM-based optimization of CRT devices resulted in higher left ventricular ejection fraction and lower end-systolic volume compared to empiric settings.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: