Key result
Electronegative LDL levels were independently associated with the degree of carotid stenosis (OR 5.40; 95% CI 1.15-25.44; p<0.033) and vulnerable plaque features in ischemic stroke patients.
Why the study?
Owing to the high risk of recurrence, identifying indicators of carotid plaque vulnerability in atherothrombotic ischemic stroke is essential.
Are electronegative LDL levels associated with plaque vulnerability in patients with ischemic stroke and carotid atherosclerosis?
Observational (n=88)
Are electronegative LDL levels associated with plaque vulnerability in patients with ischemic stroke and carotid atherosclerosis?
Odds Ratio: 5.4 (95% CI 1.15–25.44)
p-value: p=<0.033
An increased proportion of electronegative LDL is independently associated with vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque characteristics in patients with recent ischemic stroke.
Should not yet change clinical management of carotid stenosis; hypothesis-generating for electronegative LDL as a vulnerability biomarker.
Owing to the high risk of recurrence, identifying indicators of carotid plaque vulnerability in atherothrombotic ischemic stroke is essential. In this study, we aimed to identify modified LDLs and antioxidant enzymes associated with plaque vulnerability in plasma from patients with a recent ischemic stroke and carotid atherosclerosis. Patients underwent an ultrasound, a CT-angiography, and an 18F-FDG PET. A blood sample was obtained from patients (n = 64, 57.8% with stenosis ≥50%) and healthy controls (n = 24). Compared to the controls, patients showed lower levels of total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein B (apoB), apoA-I, apoA-II, and apoE, and higher levels of apoJ. Patients showed lower platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase (PAF-AH) and paraoxonase-1 (PON-1) enzymatic activities in HDL, and higher plasma levels of oxidized LDL (oxLDL) and electronegative LDL (LDL(−)). The only difference between patients with stenosis ≥50% and <50% was the proportion of LDL(−). In a multivariable logistic regression analysis, the levels of LDL(−), but not of oxLDL, were independently associated with the degree of carotid stenosis (OR: 5.40, CI: 1.15–25.44, p < 0.033), the presence of hypoechoic plaque (OR: 7.52, CI: 1.26–44.83, p < 0.027), and of diffuse neovessels (OR: 10.77, CI: 1.21–95.93, p < 0.033), indicating that an increased proportion of LDL(−) is associated with vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Puig et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Ischemic stroke and carotid atherosclerosis (n=88). Electronegative LDL (LDL(-)) vs. Lower levels of LDL(-) / Healthy controls was evaluated on Degree of carotid stenosis (OR 5.40, 95% CI 1.15-25.44, p=<0.033). Electronegative LDL levels were independently associated with the degree of carotid stenosis (OR 5.40; 95% CI 1.15-25.44; p<0.033) and vulnerable plaque features in ischemic stroke patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: