Does conservative management with local instillation of chemotherapeutic agents ± radiotherapy improve symptoms in patients with malignant pericardial effusion?
Conservative management with local chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy may be an effective alternative to surgical pericardial window for malignant pericardial effusion.
The traditional approach to treatment of malignant pericardial effusion has been surgical, with establishment of a pericardial window. Conservative management with local instillation of chemotherapeutic agents and/or focal radiotherapy has received less attention, particularly when solid tumors have been causative. This series of 5 patients with antemortem diagnoses of malignant pericardial disease had predominant pericardial effusion rather than tumor encasement as the basis for tamponade. These 5 patients received initial therapy with local instillation of a chemotherapeutic agent ± radiotherapy. Four of the 5 made complete responses with total disappearance of cardiac symptoms and signs. Two of the responders are dead, 4 and 12 months, respectively, after initial treatment, neither showing significant pericardial fluid at postmortem examination. Two patients are alive and asymptomatic, 40 months and 8 months, respectively, after initial therapy. A literature review of treatment of malignant pericardial effusions discloses longer symptom-free intervals in patients treated by conservative measures compared to surgical programs utilizing pericardial window accompanied by any combination of other treatment modalities.
Smith et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: