A significant proportion of ECGs in the pediatric emergency department are interpreted differently by pediatric cardiologists, highlighting the need for improved resident education and expert review.
May warrant cardiologist review of pediatric ED ECGs; leaves open whether education improves accuracy in larger studies.
OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the quality of electrocardiogram (ECG) use in a pediatric emergency department (PED). RESEARCH DESIGN: Patient series. SETTING: Pediatric emergency department in a university-based hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Seventy patients, aged 2 months to 22 years. MEASUREMENTS: All ECGs obtained in the PED were received by the Division of Pediatric Cardiology during the 15-month study period. The charts of all patients were then reviewed to determine the (1) indications for obtaining an ECG; (2) accuracy of documentation; (3) impact of ECG results on the treatment of patients; and (4) concordance between PED and pediatric cardiologists in ECG interpretation. RESULTS: Chest pain was the most commonly documented indication, accounting for 54% of the ECGs obtained. Other indications were suspected arrhythmias (11%), seizure and syncope (11%), drug exposure (8%), and miscellaneous (16%). Twelve charts (17%) lacked documentation of ECG results. Ten ECGs (14%) were performed improperly. Twenty three (32%) were interpreted differently by the pediatric cardiologists; 14 ECGs (20%) had potential clinical relevance. Thirty-seven (52%) ECGs were useful in patient care; this was significantly associated with the presence of a PED attending (P = .03 by Fisher's Exact Test). CONCLUSION: We recommend education of pediatric residents in ECG interpretation and subsequent review by a pediatric cardiologist of each ECG performed in the PED.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lisa Horton (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: