Key result
Third-year pediatric residents correctly identified 2.4 more ECG finding and diagnosis pairings out of 10 compared to first-year residents.
Why the study?
Does resident year or completion of a pediatric cardiology rotation improve ECG interpretation skills in pediatric residents?
Cross-Sectional (n=46)
No
Does resident year or completion of a pediatric cardiology rotation improve ECG interpretation skills in pediatric residents?
Mean Difference: 2.4 (95% CI 0.32–4.4)
Absolute Event Rate: 6.6% vs 4.1%
p-value: p=0.02
Pediatric residents' ECG interpretation skills significantly improve with advancing training year and completion of a pediatric cardiology rotation.
May warrant enhanced ECG training during pediatric residency; leaves open optimal educational strategies for prospective evaluation.
OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate pediatric residents' ability to correctly identify electrocardiogram (ECG) findings and pair them to a corresponding cardiac diagnosis. METHODS: Forty-six pediatric residents from the Johns Hopkins Children's Center were surveyed to evaluate their ability to interpret ECGs and factors affecting that ability. Included in the survey was a packet of 10 patient vignettes each accompanied by a 12-lead ECG. The primary outcome variable was the resident's score of correctly paired ECG findings with the appropriate cardiac diagnosis. One point was given for each pair correctly identified for a maximum of 10 points. Simple and multiple linear regression was used to estimate the magnitude and significance of any association between score of correct responses and resident year, completion of a pediatric cardiology rotation, self-rated ability to read ECGs, and training received in reading ECGs. RESULTS: The mean number of correct ECG findings and cardiac diagnosis pairings out of 10 for the PGY 1 group was 4.1 +/- 3, PGY 2 group 4.9 +/- 2.9, PGY 3 group 6.6 +/- 2, and the PGY 4 group 6.8 +/- 1.7. In the unadjusted linear regression model, the PGY 3 group correctly identified 2.4 more pairings compared to the PGY 1 group (P =0.02). Those who completed a pediatric cardiology rotation correctly identified 2.5 more pairings compared to those who did not complete a rotation (P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: ECG interpretation significantly improved from PGY 1 to PGY 3. Educational programs involving ECG interpretation should target those diagnoses with high clinical severity and average to poor resident knowledge.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Crocetti et al. (2010) conducted a cross-sectional in ECG interpretation skills (n=46). Postgraduate year 3 (PGY 3) training vs. Postgraduate year 1 (PGY 1) training was evaluated on Score of correctly paired ECG findings with the appropriate cardiac diagnosis (out of 10) (MD 2.4, 95% CI 0.32-4.4, p=0.02). Third-year pediatric residents correctly identified 2.4 more ECG finding and diagnosis pairings out of 10 compared to first-year residents.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: