Key result
Broadly defined notched T-waves in lead V3 are ~3.3-fold more frequent in LQT2 than LQT1.
Why the study?
Management of long QT syndrome varies by genotype, and although notched T-waves are characteristic of LQT2, they can appear physiologically in children, making their diagnostic value in pediatric patients uncertain.
Does visual evaluation of precordial T-wave morphology distinguish LQT2 from LQT1 in junior high school-aged patients with genetically confirmed long QT syndrome?
Cohort (n=30)
No
Does visual evaluation of precordial T-wave morphology distinguish LQT2 from LQT1 in junior high school-aged patients with genetically confirmed long QT syndrome?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In junior high school students with LQTS, broadly defined notched T-waves in lead V4 strongly indicate LQT2 (95% specificity), while their absence in lead V3 suggests LQT1 (100% negative predictive value).
Background and Aim: In Japan, long QT syndrome (LQTS) is frequently diagnosed in junior high school students through school-based electrocardiographic screening, and its management varies with genotype. Although notched T-waves are characteristic of LQT2, they can also appear physiologically in children, making their diagnostic value in pediatric patients uncertain. Thus, this study evaluated their clinical significance. Materials and Methods and Results: We retrospectively reviewed 24 years of medical records from a single institution and analyzed clinical data and electrocardiograms obtained from junior high school-aged patients with genetically confirmed LQT1 or LQT2. T-wave morphology in the precordial leads was visually evaluated for notched, biphasic, or negative features, collectively defined as “broadly defined notched T-waves.” No significant differences were observed in age, sex, heart rate, or QT interval between the 20 patients with LQT1 and 10 patients with LQT2. Broadly defined notched T-waves were significantly more frequent in LQT2 than LQT1, especially in leads V3 (30% vs. 100%, P < 0.001) and V4 (5% vs. 50%, P = 0.009). In lead V3, broadly defined notched T-waves showed 100% sensitivity, 70% specificity, 63% positive predictive value, and 100% negative predictive value for distinguishing LQT2 from LQT1. In lead V4, these waves showed 50% sensitivity, 95% specificity, 83% positive predictive value, and 79% negative predictive value. Conclusions: In junior high school students with LQTS, notched T-waves in lead V4 are strongly associated with LQT2, whereas their absence in lead V3 suggests LQT1. These findings may aid in differentiating between LQT1 and LQT2 based on electrocardiographic morphology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Watanabe et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Pediatric long QT syndrome (genetically confirmed LQT1 or LQT2) (n=30). Visual evaluation of precordial T-wave morphology (broadly defined notched T-waves in LQT2) vs. LQT1 patients was evaluated on Frequency of broadly defined notched T-waves in lead V3 (and V4) distinguishing LQT2 from LQT1 (p=<0.001). Broadly defined notched T-waves were more frequent in LQT2 than LQT1 in leads V3 and V4.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: