Key result
NOACs significantly reduced the risk of VTE and VTE-related death compared with aspirin, with apixaban demonstrating the most favorable bleeding profile compared with other NOACs, warfarin, and aspirin.
Why the study?
Do NOACs reduce VTE and VTE-related death compared to aspirin, warfarin, or placebo in adults requiring extended treatment of VTE?
Population
Adults with an objectively confirmed deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism or both requiring extended…
Comparison
Non-VKA oral anticoagulants as a class… vs Aspirin, warfarin (target INR 2.0-3.0), or placebo
Design
Meta-analysis
Follow-up
>3 months
Authors
Loading...
Supports NOAC preference over aspirin for extended VTE prevention; extends prior trials by ranking apixaban's superior bleeding safety.
Network Meta-Analysis
Do NOACs reduce VTE and VTE-related death compared to aspirin, warfarin, or placebo in adults requiring extended treatment of VTE?
Relative Risk: 0.28 (95% CI 0.14–0.51)
NOACs are effective for the extended prevention of VTE, with apixaban demonstrating the most favorable bleeding safety profile among oral anticoagulants.
Cohen et al. (2016) conducted a network meta-analysis in Venous Thromboembolism (VTE). Non-VKA oral anticoagulants (apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban) vs. Aspirin, warfarin INR 2.0-3.0, or placebo was evaluated on Composite of VTE and VTE-related death (Apixaban vs. Aspirin comparison) (RR 0.28, 95% CI 0.14-0.51). NOACs significantly reduced the risk of VTE and VTE-related death compared with aspirin, with apixaban demonstrating the most favorable bleeding profile compared with other NOACs, warfarin, and aspirin.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: