Why the study?
Does a multifaceted quality improvement program increase appropriate anticoagulant use in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Cross-Sectional (n=4,604)
Yes
Does a multifaceted quality improvement program increase appropriate anticoagulant use in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A multifaceted primary care intervention combining education, decision support software, and peer feedback significantly improved guideline-concordant anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation.
BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a cause of stroke, and undertreatment with anticoagulants is a persistent issue despite their effectiveness. AIM: To increase the proportion of people with AF treated appropriately using anticoagulants, and reduce inappropriate antiplatelet therapy. DESIGN OF STUDY: Cross-sectional analysis. SETTING: Electronic patient health records on 4604 patients with AF obtained from general practices in three inner London primary care trusts between April 2011 and 2013. METHOD: The Anticoagulant Programme East London (APEL) sought to achieve its aims through an intervention with three components: altering professional beliefs using new clinical guidance and related education; facilitating change using computer software to support clinical decisions and patient review optimising anticoagulation; motivating change through evaluative feedback showing individual practice performance relative to peers. RESULTS: From April 2011 to April 2013, the proportion of people with CHA2DS2-VASc ≥1 on anticoagulants increased from 52.6% to 59.8% (trend difference P<0.001). The proportion of people with CHA2DS2-VASc ≥1 on aspirin declined from 37.7% to 30.3% (trend difference P<0.001). Comparing the 2 years before the intervention with the 2 years after, numbers of new people on the AF register almost doubled from 108 to 204. CONCLUSIONS: The APEL programme supports improvement in clinical managing AF by a combined programme of education around agreed guidance, computer aids to facilitate decision-making and patient review and feedback of locally identifiable results. If replicated nationally over 3 years, such a programme could result in approximately 1600 fewer strokes every year.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robson et al. (2014) conducted a cross-sectional in Atrial fibrillation (n=4,604). Anticoagulant Programme East London (APEL) vs. Pre-intervention period (April 2008 to April 2011) was evaluated on Proportion of patients with AF and CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥1 on anticoagulants (trend difference 1.63, 95% CI 1.32-1.94, p=<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: