Why the study?
Anticoagulation for AF is improving nationally but remains marked by provider variation, while uncontrolled blood pressure and coronary artery disease further increase cardiovascular risk.
Does a pharmacist-led, software-supported multidisciplinary quality improvement programme increase anticoagulation rates in eligible patients with atrial fibrillation?
Does a pharmacist-led, software-supported multidisciplinary quality improvement programme increase anticoagulation rates in eligible patients with atrial fibrillation?
Absolute Event Rate: 83.3% vs 77%
p-value: p=<0.0001
A pharmacist-led, software-supported multidisciplinary intervention significantly improved guideline-directed anticoagulation rates in eligible AF patients compared to the national average.
Nationally, anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation (AF) is improving but remains characterised by marked provider variation. Uncontrolled blood pressure and coronary artery disease further increase cardiovascular risk. Redbridge Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) and local National Health Service (NHS) hospital trusts supported a programme to improve anticoagulation, blood pressure and cholesterol management; the ABC of AF improvement. The programme was delivered by a clinical pharmacist in 43 general practices, who used Active Patient Link (APL-AF) software to identify and electronically review the records of AF patients potentially suitable for anticoagulation. These patients were invited for a general practitioner (GP)-pharmacist consultation with initiation of anticoagulation where appropriate. Blood pressure and lipid treatment were also optimised. The university-based Clinical Effectiveness Group (CEG) provided software support using standard data entry templates from which the APL-AF software was enabled. This identified suitable patients (eg, on aspirin monotherapy, no treatment or inappropriate dual treatments) for clinical and treatment review. It also reported real-time overall practice performance. Additionally, GP education on direct oral anticoagulant initiation in general practices, use of software and performance reviews, took place for all practices in Redbridge. A weekly multidisciplinary team (MDT) video conference discussed complex patients with a cardiologist, haematologist, GP with specialist interest in cardiology, GP coordinator and clinical pharmacist. This enabled sharing of patient records between GPs and hospital specialists with improved communication and learning. Over 1 year 2016–2017, anticoagulation in eligible AF patients (CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc≥2) increased significantly by 6.3% from 77.0% to 83.3% (p<0.0001), in comparison to 2.8% average improvement in England. Exception reporting was also significantly reduced from 10.0% to 5.8%; a reduction of 4.2% in comparison to a reduction in England of 1.5%. Use of antiplatelet monotherapy was approximately halved, from 12.3% to 6.4%. These methods are being scaled locally in other London CCGs and are potentially scalable nationally, specifically targeting the poorer performing CCGs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chahal et al. (2019) studied Atrial fibrillation. ABC of AF improvement programme vs. Baseline (pre-intervention) and average improvement in England was evaluated on Anticoagulation rate in eligible AF patients (p=<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: