Key result
This review discusses apixaban and subgroup analyses from trials comparing novel oral anticoagulants with warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.
Why the study?
Does apixaban prevent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation compared to warfarin?
Does apixaban prevent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation compared to warfarin?
This review summarizes the evidence for apixaban and other novel oral anticoagulants as alternatives to warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Apixaban supported as alternative to warfarin for AF stroke prevention; leaves open optimal use in key subgroups.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with significant mortality and morbidity, and stroke represents the most-feared complication. Consequently, AF treatment has focused on thromboprophylaxis, with warfarin as the mainstay of therapy. However, concerns over ease of use and safety have limited its use. Three novel oral anticoagulants have been approved for use in stroke prevention in AF based on randomized data: 1) dabigatran, studied in Randomized Evaluation of Long-term Anticoagulation Therapy (RE-LY); 2) rivaroxaban, studied in Rivaroxaban Once-daily, Oral, Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared with Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation (ROCKET AF); and 3) apixaban, studied in Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation (ARISTOTLE). In this review, we focus on apixaban and discuss subgroup analyses that have been performed in the three trials comparing novel oral anticoagulants with warfarin. We conclude with recommendations regarding further investigations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hess et al. (2013) conducted a review in Atrial fibrillation. Apixaban vs. Warfarin was evaluated on Stroke prevention. This review discusses apixaban and subgroup analyses from trials comparing novel oral anticoagulants with warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: