The difference in ATPase activity between myosin S-1 isozymes at low ionic strength is driven by a difference in their actual binding affinity for actin, which normalizes at higher ionic strengths.
May explain isoform ATPase differences in muscle; leaves open in vivo cardiac relevance.
Myosin subfragment 1 (S-1) can be fractionated into two isozymes, (A1)S-1 containing alkali light chain 1 and (A2)S-1 containing alkali light chain 2. The predominant difference in the behavior of the two isozymes of S-1 is that, at low ionic strength, the actin concentration required for half-maximal ATPase activity is considerably lower for (A1)S-1 than for (A2)S-1; that is, the apparent binding constant KATPase for (A1)S-1 is greater than KATPase for (A2)S-1 [Weeds, A.G., & Taylor, R.S. (1975) Nature (London) 257, 54-56]. This difference disappears at high ionic strength [Wagner, P. D., Slater, C. S., Pope, B., & Weeds, A.G. (1979) Eur. J. Biochem. 99, 385-394]. In the present study we investigated whether the difference in the KATPase values of (A1)S-1 and (A2)S-1 is due to a difference in the actual affinity of these S-1 isozymes for actin. Binding was measured in the presence of ATP and AMP-PNP and in the absence of nucleotide at varied ionic strengths. We found that at low ionic strength where KATPase is several times stronger for (A1)S-1 than for (A2)S-1, the binding of (A1)S-1 to actin is correspondingly stronger than that of (A2)S-1 irrespective of the nucleotide present. Furthermore, as the ionic strength is increased, just as the difference between the KATPase values for (A1)S-1 and (A2)S-1 disappears so too does the difference in the affinity of the two isozymes for actin.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chalovich et al. (1984) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: