Key result
Fulminant giant cell myocarditis was associated with a significantly higher rate of death or cardiac transplantation compared to fulminant lymphocytic myocarditis (100% vs 28.6%, HR 5.329).
Why the study?
Fulminant myocarditis is a rapidly progressive and frequently fatal form of myocarditis that has been difficult to classify.
Observational (n=16)
No
Hazard Ratio: 5.329 (95% CI 1.102–25.777)
Absolute Event Rate: 100% vs 28.6%
p-value: p=0.037
Fulminant giant cell myocarditis has a significantly worse prognosis than fulminant lymphocytic myocarditis, and hs-CRP levels can help differentiate the two conditions and predict outcomes.
May warrant biopsy differentiation in fulminant myocarditis; leaves open whether targeted therapy improves giant cell outcomes.
Objectives: Fulminant myocarditis (FM) is a rapidly progressive and frequently fatal form of myocarditis that has been difficult to classify. This study aims to compare the clinical characteristics, treatments and outcomes in patients with fulminant giant cell myocarditis (FGCM) and fulminant lymphocytic myocarditis (FLM). Methods and Results: In our retrospective study, nine patients with FGCM (mean age 47.9 ± 7.5 years, six female) and 7 FLM (mean age 42.1 ± 12.3 years, four female) patients confirmed by histology in the last 11 years were included. Most patients with FGCM and FLM were NYHA functional class IV (56 vs. 100%, p = 0.132). Patients with FGCM had significantly lower levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein [hs-CRP, 4.4 (2.0–10.2) mg/L vs. 13.6 (12.6–14.6) mg/L, P = 0.004, data shown as the median with IQR], creatine kinase-myoglobin [CK-MB, 1.4 (1.0–3.2) ng/ml vs. 14.6 (3.0–64.9) ng/ml, P = 0.025, median with IQR], and alanine aminotransferase [ALT, 38.0 (25.0–61.5) IU/L vs. 997.0 (50.0–3,080.0) IU/L, P = 0.030, median with IQR] and greater right ventricular end-diastolic diameter (RVEDD) [2.9 ± 0.3 cm vs. 2.4 ± 0.6 cm, P = 0.034, mean ± SD] than those with FLM. No differences were observed in the use of intra-aortic balloon pump (44 vs. 43%, p = 1.000) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (11 vs. 43%, p = 0.262) between the two groups. The long-term survival rate was significantly lower in FGCM group compared with FLM group (0 vs. 71.4%, p = 0.022). A multivariate cox regression analysis showed the level of hs-CRP (hazard ratio = 0.871, 95% confidence interval: 0.761–0.996, P = 0.043) was an independent prognostic factor for FM patients. Furthermore, the level of hs-CRP had a good ability to discriminate between patients with FGCM and FLM (AUC = 0.94, 95% confidence interval: 0.4213–0.9964). Conclusions: The inflammatory response and myocardial damage in the patients with FGCM were milder than those with FLM. Patients with FGCM had distinctly poorer prognoses compared with those with FLM. Our results suggest that hs-CRP could be a promising prognostic biomarker and a hs-CRP level of 11.71 mg/L is an appropriate cutoff point for the differentiating diagnosis between patients with FGCM and FLM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Fulminant myocarditis (n=16). Fulminant giant cell myocarditis vs. Fulminant lymphocytic myocarditis was evaluated on Death or cardiac transplantation (HR 5.329, 95% CI 1.102-25.777, p=0.037). Fulminant giant cell myocarditis was associated with a significantly higher rate of death or cardiac transplantation compared to fulminant lymphocytic myocarditis (100% vs 28.6%, HR 5.329).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: