Key result
A protocolised secondary coronary disease prevention programme in patients aged ≥70 years with recent acute coronary syndrome improved optimal risk factor control (RR 2.18; 95% CI 1.36-3.50; NNT 3).
Why the study?
Does a protocolised secondary coronary disease prevention programme improve optimal risk factor control in patients aged ≥70 years with a recent acute coronary syndrome?
RCT (n=127)
Open-label
parallel groups
Does a protocolised secondary coronary disease prevention programme improve optimal risk factor control in patients aged ≥70 years with a recent acute coronary syndrome?
Relative Risk: 2.18 (95% CI 1.36–3.5)
Absolute Risk Reduction: 34.2%
Number Needed to Treat: 3
A secondary coronary disease prevention program in elderly patients with recent ACS significantly improves risk factor control, diet adherence, and physical functionality.
Supports protocolised prevention programmes in elderly post-ACS patients; extends secondary prevention evidence to age ≥70.
Background Elderly patients have been underrepresented in secondary cardiovascular prevention programmes. This study aimed to ascertain the effects of a secondary coronary disease prevention programme in these patients. Design Open randomised intervention study with parallel groups. Methods One hundred and twenty-seven patients aged ≥70 years with a recent acute coronary syndrome were randomised to a protocolised clinical intervention plus usual care (intervention group, n = 64) or to usual care alone (control group, n = 63). Patients were assessed at baseline and after 12 months. The main outcome was the percentage of patients with optimal risk factor control after 12 months of follow-up. Secondary outcomes included changes in Mediterranean diet adherence, quality of life and functionality. Mortality was evaluated three years after the end of the intervention. Results One hundred and six patients (83.4%) completed 12 months of follow-up (54 in the intervention group and 52 in the control group). At the end of intervention, 34.2% more patients in the intervention group had achieved optimal risk factor control with a number needed to treat of 3 (relative risk 2.18, 95% confidence interval 1.36 to 3.50). The intervention group improved adherence to the Mediterranean diet ( p = 0.013) and functionality assessed by the Short Physical Performance Battery ( p = 0.047). No differences between groups were found in quality of life (Short-Form 36 Health Survey) or mortality after three years (hazard ratio 1.19, 95% confidence interval 0.41 to 3.45). Conclusions A secondary coronary disease prevention programme in elderly patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome improved risk factor control, Mediterranean diet adherence and functionality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marcos-Forniol et al. (2017) conducted an RCT in acute coronary syndrome (n=127). protocolised clinical intervention vs. usual care alone was evaluated on percentage of patients with optimal risk factor control after 12 months of follow-up (RR 2.18, 95% CI 1.36 to 3.50). A protocolised secondary coronary disease prevention programme in patients aged ≥70 years with recent acute coronary syndrome improved optimal risk factor control (RR 2.18; 95% CI 1.36-3.50; NNT 3).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: