Key result
During a cold pressor test, women exhibited smaller increases in mean arterial pressure and femoral vascular resistance than men, unpredicted by sympathetic nerve activity.
Why the study?
Muscle sympathetic nerve activity affects vascular resistance differently in women and men, but whether this sex difference persists during pronounced increases in sympathetic activity remains unclear.
Do sex differences exist in neurovascular and neurohemodynamic relationships during cold pressor test-mediated sympathoexcitation in young healthy adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=21)
Do sex differences exist in neurovascular and neurohemodynamic relationships during cold pressor test-mediated sympathoexcitation in young healthy adults?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In young healthy adults, men experience robust blood pressure responses driven by neurovascular coupling during sympathetic activation, whereas this relationship is absent in women.
Muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) affects vascular resistance differently in women and men. However, whether this sex difference persists during pronounced increases in MSNA remains unclear. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine sex differences in neurovascular transduction during cold pressor test (CPT)-mediated sympathoexcitation. Integrated peroneal MSNA (microneurography) was measured at rest and during a 3-min CPT in young healthy women ( n = 11) and men ( n = 10). Mean arterial pressure (MAP) was measured beat-by-beat (Finometer), and superficial femoral artery blood flow was measured using duplex ultrasound. Femoral vascular resistance (FVR) was quantified as MAP/femoral blood flow (mmHg/mL/min). Baseline MSNA was similar between women and men (14 ± 9 vs. 15 ± 9 bursts/100 heartbeat, respectively; P = 0.83), whereas MAP was lower (86 ± 7 vs. 92 ± 4 mmHg; P = 0.047), and FVR was greater in women than men (0.54 ± 0.16 vs. 0.36 ± 0.15 mmHg/mL/min; P = 0.02). CPT-induced increases in MSNA were similar between the sexes (19 ± 11 vs. 26 ± 14 bursts/100 heartbeat; P = 0.26) whereas increases in MAP (7 ± 3 vs. 10 ± 3 mmHg; P = 0.03) and FVR (3.2 ± 18.6 vs. 26.8 ± 12.8%; P < 0.01) were smaller in women than in men. Within men, CPT- induced increases in MSNA predicted increases in MAP ( R 2 = 0.51, P = 0.02) and FVR ( R 2 = 0.49, P = 0.02). However, MSNA did not predict MAP ( R 2 = 0.11, P = 0.35) or FVR ( R 2 = 0.07, P = 0.46) in women. Our findings demonstrate that men experience robust CPT-induced MAP responses that are driven by both neurovascular (MSNA-FVR) and neurohemodynamic (MSNA-MAP) coupling. These relationships were not observed in women, indicating that even during pronounced increases in sympathetic outflow, MSNA is not predictive of vascular nor blood pressure outcomes in young healthy women.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Coovadia et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy (n=21). Female sex vs. Male sex was evaluated on CPT-induced increase in mean arterial pressure (mmHg) (p=0.03). During a cold pressor test, women exhibited smaller increases in mean arterial pressure and femoral vascular resistance than men, unpredicted by sympathetic nerve activity.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: