Why the study?
Does treatment at a general medical clinic improve blood pressure control in hypertensive patients?
Does treatment at a general medical clinic improve blood pressure control in hypertensive patients?
Traditional general medical clinics may be inadequate for the long-term management of hypertension, characterized by high loss to follow-up and poor blood pressure control.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
General clinics show high attrition and low BP control in hypertension; leaves open whether specialized models improve retention and outcomes.
The treatment of high blood pressure at the general medical clinic of a traditionally oriented university hospital was found to be unsatisfactory for most patients. Charts of all hypertensive patients (diastolic blood pressure, greater than or equal to 105 mm Hg) who made their first clinic visit in 1964 or 1971 were reviewed. Half of all patients were lost to follow-up within the first year, and blood pressure control was achieved by only one third of the patients. New information contained in the Veterans Administration study reports (1967 and 1970) had no effect on workup, compliance, or blood pressure decline. Furthermore, no significant relationship was found between blood pressure reduction and medical process, therapeutic regimens, or patient compliance. These data suggest that, in contrast to experience obtained in programs specifically designed for long-term management of this chronic disease, the present-day general medical clinic cannot satisfy the needs of most hypertensive patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michael H. Alderman (1977) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: