Key result
Simultaneous measurement of blood pressure in both arms detected a systolic interarm difference >10 mmHg in 10.7% of participants and reclassified 10.3% above the 130-mmHg systolic threshold.
Why the study?
Guidelines recommend measuring blood pressure in both arms and using the higher reading, prompting evaluation of interarm pressure difference distribution, associated factors, and risk classification impact.
Does using the higher versus lower arm blood pressure reading reclassify BP and ASCVD risk in community-dwelling adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=2,912)
Yes
Does using the higher versus lower arm blood pressure reading reclassify BP and ASCVD risk in community-dwelling adults?
Assessing blood pressure simultaneously in both arms and using the higher reading reclassifies hypertension status in approximately 10% of adults, supporting guideline recommendations.
Background Guidelines recommend measuring blood pressure (BP) in both arms and using the higher reading. Aim To determine interarm pressure difference (IAD) distribution and associated factors, and BP and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk classification using the higher and lower readings. Design & setting This cohort study used a representative cross-sectional sample of community-dwelling residents aged ≥40 years on four Caribbean islands (Barbados, Puerto Rico, US Virgin Islands, and Trinidad). Method BP was measured simultaneously in both arms. Mixed effects logistic and linear regression tested associations with an IAD. BP and ASCVD risk were classified using the higher and lower BP. Results Of 2912 participants (mean age 57.2 years), 10.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 9.6 to 11.8) and 3.3% (95% CI = 2.6 to 3.9) had systolic IADs ≥10 mmHg and ≥15 mmHg, respectively, and 5.0% (95% CI = 4.2 to 5.8) and 1.8% (95% CI = 1.3 to 2.3) diastolic IADs ≥10 mmHg and ≥15 mmHg, respectively. Independent associations with systolic and diastolic IADs ≥10 mmHg and/or continuous outcomes, included increasing body mass index (BMI), systolic and diastolic pressures and hypertension ( P <0.05). Higher versus lower arm BP reclassified 10.3% (95% CI = 7.8 to 12.8) and 8.3% (95% CI = 5.9 to 10.7) from below to above the 130-mmHg and 140-mmHg systolic thresholds, respectively, 10.8% (95% CI = 8.2 to 13.3) and 6.9% (95% CI = 4.9 to 8.9) at the 80-mmHg and 90-mmHg diastolic thresholds, respectively, and 9.2% (95% CI = 0.0 to 18.4) of those with an IAD of ≥10 mmHg at the ≥10% 10-year ASCVD risk threshold. Conclusion Assessing both arms detects an IAD ≥10 mmHg and reclassifies BP in about 1 in 10 people. Increasing BMI and BP increase the risk of an IAD ≥10 mmHg or 15 mmHg.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adams et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Hypertension and Cardiovascular Risk (n=2,912). Simultaneous interarm blood pressure measurement vs. Single arm blood pressure measurement was evaluated on Prevalence of systolic interarm blood pressure difference >10 mmHg (95% CI 9.6-11.8). Simultaneous measurement of blood pressure in both arms detected a systolic interarm difference >10 mmHg in 10.7% of participants and reclassified 10.3% above the 130-mmHg systolic threshold.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: