Using an exponential smoothing procedure and an autoregressive-moving average process; forecasts for the monthly Palmer Drought Severity Index were calculated. The autocorrelation and partial autocorrelation functions of severity index values were used as a starting point for the autoregressive-moving average model selection process. Of the many possible autoregressive-moving average models, the one that was selected provided the best forecasts based on the mean square error. Monthly data for the period 1929–1969 were utilized in a nonlinear least-squares computer routine to arrive at estimated parameter values for the autoregressive-moving average model. Monthly forecasts with a lead time of one month were generated using the exponential smoothing and autoregressive-moving average procedures for the period 1970–1972. These forecasts were compared with the myopic (persistence) forecasts, Xt+1=Xt. The mean square errors of the forecasts were 0.63 for the autoregressive-moving average model, 0.65 for the myopic model, and 0.79 for the exponential smoothing model. From the mean-square-error calculations, it appears that there is no statistically significant difference between the forecasts given by the Box-Jenkins and myopic models; however, the 95% confidence intervals for these two models overlap only slightly during the first part of the forecast period indicating that there may be some advantage to using the Box-Jenkins model instead of the myopic model. Both of these models are superior to the exponential smoothing model. These results demonstrate the usefulness of the relatively new autoregressive-moving average time series analysis procedures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Davis et al. (1974) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: