Key result
The NEO-CCNN algorithm achieved >99.79% R-peak detection on the MIT-BIH database and attained 97.83% classification accuracy and 96.46% sensitivity when implemented on a microcontroller.
Why the study?
Embedded arrhythmia classification is needed for heart disease prevention in wearable applications requiring implementation on simple microcontrollers.
The proposed NEO-CCNN algorithm provides highly accurate and sensitive arrhythmia classification suitable for implementation on simple microcontrollers in wearable ECG devices.
May enable low-power wearable arrhythmia detection; leaves open prospective clinical validation before adoption.
Embedded arrhythmia classification is the first step towards heart diseases prevention in wearable applications. In this paper, a robust arrhythmia classification algorithm, NEO-CCNN, for wearables that can be implemented on a simple microcontroller is proposed. The NEO-CCNN algorithm not only detects QRS complex but also accurately locates R-peak with the help of the proposed adaptive time-dependent thresholding technique, improving the accuracy and sensitivity in arrhythmia classification. An optimized compact 1D-CNN network (CCNN) with 9,701 parameters is used for classification. A QRS complex augmentation method is introduced in the training process to cater for R-peak location error (RLE). A nested k 1 k 2 -fold cross-validation method is utilized to evaluate the robustness of the proposed algorithm. Simulation results show that the proposed algorithm has the ability to detect more than 99.79% of R peaks with an RLE of 7.94 ms for the MIT-BIH database. Implemented on the STM32F407 microcontroller, NEO-CNN attains a classification accuracy of 97.83% and sensitivity of 96.46% using only 8s window size.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sabor et al. (2022) studied Arrhythmia. NEO-CCNN algorithm was evaluated on Classification accuracy and sensitivity. The NEO-CCNN algorithm achieved >99.79% R-peak detection on the MIT-BIH database and attained 97.83% classification accuracy and 96.46% sensitivity when implemented on a microcontroller.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: