Thrombolytic therapy resulted in significantly lower resting pulmonary artery mean pressure compared to heparin (17 vs. 22 mmHg, p<0.05) at 7.4 years follow-up.
RCT (n=23)
Absolute Event Rate: 17% vs 22%
p-value: p=<0.05
A total of 23 of the 40 patients who had angiographically proven pulmonary embolism and who had initially been randomized to an IV infusion of heparin (n = 11) or a thrombolytic agent (urokinase or streptokinase, n = 12) were restudied after a mean follow-up of 7.4 years to measure the right-sided pressures and to evaluate their response to exercise during supine bicycle ergometry. Results showed that, at rest, the pulmonary artery (PA) mean pressure and the pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) were significantly higher in the heparin group compared with the thrombolytic group (22 vs. 17 mmHg, p<0.05, and 351 vs. 171 dynes s(-1) cm(-5), p<0.02, respectively). During exercise both parameters rose to a significantly higher level in the heparin group (from rest to exercise, PA: 22-32 mmHg, p<0.01; PVR: 351-437 dynes s(-1) cm 5, p<0.01, respectively), but not in the thrombolytic group (rest to exercise, PA: 17-19 mm Hg, p = NS; PVR: 171-179 dynes s(-1) cm(-5), p = NS). It is concluded that thrombolytic therapy preserves the normal hemodynamic response to exercise in the long term and may prevent recurrences of venous thromboembolism and the development of pulmonary hypertension.
Sharma et al. (Mon,) conducted a rct in Pulmonary embolism (n=23). Thrombolytic therapy (urokinase or streptokinase) vs. IV infusion of heparin was evaluated on Pulmonary artery (PA) mean pressure at rest (p=<0.05). Thrombolytic therapy resulted in significantly lower resting pulmonary artery mean pressure compared to heparin (17 vs. 22 mmHg, p<0.05) at 7.4 years follow-up.