Key result
Thrombolytic therapy resulted in significantly lower resting pulmonary artery mean pressure compared to heparin (17 vs. 22 mmHg, p<0.05) at 7.4 years follow-up.
Why the study?
Does thrombolytic therapy improve long-term right-sided pressures and exercise response in patients with pulmonary embolism compared to heparin?
RCT (n=23)
Does thrombolytic therapy improve long-term right-sided pressures and exercise response in patients with pulmonary embolism compared to heparin?
Thrombolytic therapy for pulmonary embolism preserves normal long-term hemodynamic response to exercise compared to heparin alone.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Thrombolysis may be favored over heparin for acute PE to improve long-term hemodynamics; extends RCT evidence beyond the acute phase.
A total of 23 of the 40 patients who had angiographically proven pulmonary embolism and who had initially been randomized to an IV infusion of heparin (n = 11) or a thrombolytic agent (urokinase or streptokinase, n = 12) were restudied after a mean follow-up of 7.4 years to measure the right-sided pressures and to evaluate their response to exercise during supine bicycle ergometry. Results showed that, at rest, the pulmonary artery (PA) mean pressure and the pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) were significantly higher in the heparin group compared with the thrombolytic group (22 vs. 17 mmHg, p<0.05, and 351 vs. 171 dynes s(-1) cm(-5), p<0.02, respectively). During exercise both parameters rose to a significantly higher level in the heparin group (from rest to exercise, PA: 22-32 mmHg, p<0.01; PVR: 351-437 dynes s(-1) cm 5, p<0.01, respectively), but not in the thrombolytic group (rest to exercise, PA: 17-19 mm Hg, p = NS; PVR: 171-179 dynes s(-1) cm(-5), p = NS). It is concluded that thrombolytic therapy preserves the normal hemodynamic response to exercise in the long term and may prevent recurrences of venous thromboembolism and the development of pulmonary hypertension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sharma et al. (2000) conducted an RCT in Pulmonary embolism (n=23). Thrombolytic therapy (urokinase or streptokinase) vs. IV infusion of heparin was evaluated on Pulmonary artery (PA) mean pressure at rest (p=<0.05). Thrombolytic therapy resulted in significantly lower resting pulmonary artery mean pressure compared to heparin (17 vs. 22 mmHg, p<0.05) at 7.4 years follow-up.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: