Key result
Altering the fraction of inspired O2 (0.1, 0.21, or 1.0) did not affect the initial phase I phosphocreatine onset kinetics during submaximal exercise (P > 0.05).
Why the study?
Does altering the fraction of inspired oxygen affect phosphocreatine onset kinetics in exercising human muscle?
RCT (n=5)
order randomised
Does altering the fraction of inspired oxygen affect phosphocreatine onset kinetics in exercising human muscle?
p-value: p=> 0.05
Altering the fraction of inspired oxygen does not affect the initial phase I phosphocreatine onset kinetics during submaximal exercise, suggesting oxygen driving pressure does not limit initial PCr kinetics.
Altering FiO2 offers no benefit for submaximal exercise PCr kinetics; leaves open primary regulators of phase I muscle energetics.
31P-magnetic resonance spectroscopy was used to study phosphocreatine (PCr) onset kinetics in exercising human gastrocnemius muscle under varied fractions of inspired O(2) (F(IO(2))). Five male subjects performed three identical work bouts (5 min duration; order randomised) at a submaximal workload while breathing 0.1, 0.21 or 1.0 F(IO(2)). Either a single or double exponential model was fitted to the PCr kinetics. The phase I tau (0.1, 38.6 +/- 7.5; 0.21, 34.5 +/- 7.9; 1.0, 38.6 +/- 9.2 s) and amplitude, A(1) (0.1, 0.34 +/- 0.03; 0.21, 0.28 +/- 0.05; 1.0, 0.28 +/- 0.03,% fall in PCr) were invariant (both P > 0.05) across F(IO(2)) trials. The initial rate of change in PCr hydrolysis at exercise onset, calculated as A(1)/tau(1) (%PCr reduction s(-1)), was the same across F(IO(2)) trials. A PCr slow component (phase II) was present at an F(IO(2)) of 0.1 and 0.21; however, breathing 1.0 F(IO(2)) ablated the slow component. The onset of the slow component resulted in a greater (P< or = 0.05) overall percentage fall in PCr (both phase I and II) as F(IO(2)) decreased (0.43 +/- 0.05, 0.34 +/- 0.05, 0.28 +/- 0.03) for 0.1, 0.21 and 1.0 F(IO(2)), respectively. These data demonstrate that altering F(IO(2)) does not affect the initial phase I PCr onset kinetics, which supports the notion that O(2) driving pressure does not limit PCr kinetics at the onset of submaximal exercise. Thus, these data imply that the manner in which microvascular and intracellular P(O(2)) regulates PCr hydrolysis in exercising muscle is not due to the initial kinetic fall in PCr at exercise onset.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Haseler et al. (2004) conducted an RCT in Exercising humans (n=5). Varied fractions of inspired O2 (F(IO2)) vs. 0.21 F(IO2) was evaluated on Phase I tau and amplitude (A1) of phosphocreatine (PCr) onset kinetics (p=> 0.05). Altering the fraction of inspired O2 (0.1, 0.21, or 1.0) did not affect the initial phase I phosphocreatine onset kinetics during submaximal exercise (P > 0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: