Key result
The multiscale model of in-stent restenosis demonstrated approximately 30% uncertainty in the mean neointimal area, with endothelium regeneration time identified as the most influential parameter.
Uncertainty quantification of a 2D in-stent restenosis model reveals that endothelium regeneration time is the most critical parameter influencing neointimal area, highlighting the need for precise biological data to improve model accuracy.
May limit reliability of restenosis model predictions for clinical translation; leaves open refinement of multiscale approaches with precise endothelial data.
PURPOSE: Coronary artery stenosis, or abnormal narrowing, is a widespread and potentially fatal cardiac disease. After treatment by balloon angioplasty and stenting, restenosis may occur inside the stent due to excessive neointima formation. Simulations of in-stent restenosis can provide new insight into this process. However, uncertainties due to variability in patient-specific parameters must be taken into account. METHODS: We performed an uncertainty quantification (UQ) study on a complex two-dimensional in-stent restenosis model. We used a quasi-Monte Carlo method for UQ of the neointimal area, and the Sobol sensitivity analysis (SA) to estimate the proportions of aleatory and epistemic uncertainties and to determine the most important input parameters. RESULTS: We observe approximately 30% uncertainty in the mean neointimal area as simulated by the model. Depending on whether a fast initial endothelium recovery occurs, the proportion of the model variance due to natural variability ranges from 15 to 35%. The endothelium regeneration time is identified as the most influential model parameter. CONCLUSION: The model output contains a moderate quantity of uncertainty, and the model precision can be increased by obtaining a more certain value on the endothelium regeneration time. We conclude that the quasi-Monte Carlo UQ and the Sobol SA are reliable methods for estimating uncertainties in the response of complicated multiscale cardiovascular models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nikishova et al. (2018) studied In-Stent Restenosis. Multiscale computational model of in-stent restenosis was evaluated on Uncertainty in mean neointimal area. The multiscale model of in-stent restenosis demonstrated approximately 30% uncertainty in the mean neointimal area, with endothelium regeneration time identified as the most influential parameter.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: