Key result
Mesenchymal stem cell scar injections cause no increase in spontaneous VT while restoring connexin 43.
Why the study?
Because the scar border zone is a main source of reentry causing ischemic VT, the authors evaluated whether injecting MSCs into this zone affects arrhythmic risks after MI.
Does autologous mesenchymal stem cell injection into the healed myocardial infarction scar border zone reduce the risk of ventricular tachycardia in a rabbit model?
Does autologous mesenchymal stem cell injection into the healed myocardial infarction scar border zone reduce the risk of ventricular tachycardia in a rabbit model?
Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 0%
Local injection of mesenchymal stem cells into the post-MI scar border zone appears safe from a proarrhythmic standpoint and promotes favorable gap junction (Cx43) remodeling in a preclinical model.
No increased spontaneous VT risk with MSC in rabbit MI model; leaves open translation to human postinfarction therapy.
The scar border zone is a main source of reentry responsible for ischemic ventricular tachycardia (VT). We evaluated the effects of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) injection into the scar border zone on arrhythmic risks in a post-myocardial infarction (MI) animal model. Rabbit MI models were generated by left descending coronary artery ligation. Surviving rabbits after 4 weeks underwent left thoracotomy and autologous MSCs or phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) was administered to scar border zones in two rabbits in each group. Another rabbit without MI underwent a sham procedure (control). An implantable loop recorder (ILR) was implanted in the left chest wall in all animals. Four weeks after cell injections, ventricular fibrillation was induced in 1/2 rabbit in the PBS group by electrophysiologic study, and no ventricular arrhythmia was induced in the MSC group or control. Spontaneous VT was not detected during ILR analysis in any animal for 4 weeks. Histologic examination showed restoration of connexin 43 (Cx43) expression in the MSC group, which was higher than in the PBS group and comparable to the control. In conclusion, MSC injections into the MI scar border zone did not increase the risk of VT and were associated with favorable Cx43 expression and arrangement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2023) studied Post-myocardial infarction (n=7). Autologous mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) vs. Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) was evaluated on Spontaneous ventricular tachycardia detected by implantable loop recorder. Mesenchymal stem cell injections into the myocardial infarction scar border zone did not increase the risk of spontaneous ventricular tachycardia and significantly restored connexin 43 expression compared to PBS.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: