Key result
Endurance training linked to ~46% higher exercise stroke volume via enhanced diastolic filling.
Why the study?
Studies display conflicting data on dynamic cardiac changes in healthy trained and untrained hearts during rest and acute exercise stress.
Does an exercise stress echocardiography protocol uncover differences in diastolic filling capacity between highly endurance-trained athletes and untrained individuals compared to resting assessment alone?
Cross-Sectional (n=20)
No
Does an exercise stress echocardiography protocol uncover differences in diastolic filling capacity between highly endurance-trained athletes and untrained individuals compared to resting assessment alone?
Effect estimate: 46% higher
Absolute Event Rate: 119% vs 79%
p-value: p=<0.05
Exercise echocardiography stress testing effectively reveals the enhanced dynamic diastolic filling capacity of endurance-trained athletes that standard resting echocardiography fails to fully capture.
Exercise echocardiography may better detect fitness-related diastolic filling differences than rest alone; hypothesis-generating and leaves open clinical adoption.
During exercise stress, heart rate (HR) increases to support cardiac output, which also reduces ventricular filling time. Although echocardiography is widely used to assess cardiac function, studies display conflicting data on the dynamic changes in the healthy trained and untrained heart during rest and acute exercise stress. To address these discrepancies, we tested a new echocardiography exercise protocol on two groups with significant differences in cardiorespiratory fitness. Ten untrained individuals with maximal oxygen uptake of 38 ± 8 ml/kg/min and 10 endurance-trained athletes matched for body surface area but with higher maximal oxygen uptake (71 ± 5 ml/kg/min) were evaluated at rest, during semi-recumbent cycling at 25 and 75 W and at a relative workload intensity eliciting a HR of 140 beats/min (HR140). Stroke volume was 36% higher in the trained at rest, and this difference increased during exercise to 42% at 25 W, 46% at 75 W and 63% at HR140 (all P < 0.05). In contrast, no group differences were found in markers of myocardial function (ventricular contraction and relaxation velocities) or other traditional echocardiographic measures of ventricular function at rest or exercise for a given HR. However, while similar at rest, diastolic and systolic function provided limited insight into differences between less fit and highly fit individuals. The new exercise echocardiography protocol improves the ability to uncover differences in dynamic changes in diastolic filling capacity that explain the previously reported higher end-diastolic compliance in endurance-trained athletes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fischer et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy adults with differing cardiorespiratory fitness (n=20). Endurance-trained athlete status vs. Untrained status was evaluated on Stroke volume during semi-recumbent cycling at 75 W (46% higher, p=<0.05). Endurance-trained athletes exhibited a higher stroke volume compared to untrained individuals, increasing from 36% higher at rest to 63% higher at a heart rate of 140 beats/min, uncovering enhanced diastolic filling capacity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: