Key result
Higher visit-to-visit systolic blood pressure variability was significantly correlated with higher loge NT-proBNP levels (r = 0.42), independently of LV hypertrophy and diastolic function.
Why the study?
Whether visit-to-visit blood pressure variability is associated with higher NT-proBNP levels has been controversial, and the underlying mechanism is not well understood.
Is visit-to-visit blood pressure variability associated with higher NT-proBNP levels independently of left ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic function in hypertensive patients?
Observational (n=72)
Is visit-to-visit blood pressure variability associated with higher NT-proBNP levels independently of left ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic function in hypertensive patients?
Effect estimate: r = 0.42
Visit-to-visit blood pressure variability is associated with elevated NT-proBNP levels in hypertensive patients, independent of left ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic dysfunction.
OBJECTIVE: The issue of whether visit-to-visit blood pressure variability (VVV) is associated with higher levels of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) has been controversial, and the underlying mechanism is not well understood. We hypothesized that (1) VVV is associated with the NT-proBNP level, and (2) this association is mediated by left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy and LV diastolic dysfunction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 72 hypertensive patients were examined. Clinic blood pressure was measured at each visit for 12 months (1×/month or every 2 months), and echocardiography was performed during this period. VVV is expressed as the SD, coefficient of variation (CV), and delta (Δ; the difference between the maximum and the minimum) in SBP and in DBP. We investigated the association between VVV and NT-proBNP and whether the LV mass index (LVMI) and the mitral early diastolic inflow velocity (E) to mitral annular early-diastolic peak velocity (e') ratio (E/e') influence this association. RESULTS: The loge NT-proBNP values were significantly correlated with the CV of SBP (r = 0.42), ΔSBP (r = 0.41), the CV of DBP (r = 0.32), and ΔDBP (r = 0.28). The CV and Δ in SBP or those in DBP were not significantly correlated with LVMI or E/e'. A multiple linear regression analysis revealed that higher CV of SBP and ΔSBP were significantly associated with loge NT-proBNP. CONCLUSION: Higher VVV was significantly associated with higher NT-proBNP independently of LV hypertrophy and diastolic function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Takahari et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Hypertension (n=72). Visit-to-visit blood pressure variability (VVV) was evaluated on loge NT-proBNP values (r = 0.42). Higher visit-to-visit systolic blood pressure variability was significantly correlated with higher loge NT-proBNP levels (r = 0.42), independently of LV hypertrophy and diastolic function.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: