Why the study?
It was not well established whether blood pressure variability is associated with incident heart failure risk and subclinical markers of heart failure and myocardial injury.
Does visit-to-visit blood pressure variability increase the risk of incident heart failure and subclinical myocardial injury in adults free of baseline cardiovascular disease?
Does visit-to-visit blood pressure variability increase the risk of incident heart failure and subclinical myocardial injury in adults free of baseline cardiovascular disease?
Visit-to-visit systolic blood pressure variability is independently associated with an increased risk of incident heart failure and longitudinal increases in subclinical markers of myocardial injury in a diverse, community-based cohort.
Does not support routine variability monitoring; leaves open whether targeting it prevents HF in primary prevention.
BACKGROUND: It is not well established whether blood pressure variability (BPV) is associated with risk of incident heart failure (HF) as well as with subclinical markers of HF and myocardial injury. We investigated these relationships in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). METHODS: We examined the association between visit-to-visit BPV (estimated by variability independent of the mean-VIM) and HF in MESA (2000-2012), a community-based cohort study of 6814 individuals free of clinical cardiovascular disease (including HF) at baseline, using Cox models and joint longitudinal-survival models. VIM was calculated from Exams 1 to 5. Serial measurements (Exams 1 and 5) of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin-T (hs-cTnT) were used to test the early onset and directionality of the relationships by logistic regression. RESULTS: Over a median of 9.4 years of follow-up, VIM-SBP was associated with HF in adjusted Cox models including CVD risk factors (HR = 1.33 [95% CI, 1.03-1.69]), as well as in joint longitudinal-survival models. BPV was associated with elevated Exam 5 NT-proBNP (>125 pg/mL) after multivariable adjustment (VIM-SBP: OR = 1.26 [95% CI, 1.17-1.37]; VIM-DBP: OR = 1.23 [95% CI, 1.14-1.33]) and Exam 5 elevation in hs-cTnT (for VIM-SBP, OR = 1.27). CONCLUSIONS: BPV was associated with incident HF and longitudinal increases of subclinical markers of HF and myocardial injury in a multi-ethnic community-based cohort. These data indicate that visit-to-visit BPV may contribute to the development of HF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nuyujukian et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: