Key result
Both ARB (HR 0.51; 95% CI 0.44-0.58) and ACEI (HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.47-0.59) reduced the risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation compared to nonusers in patients with hypertension.
Why the study?
Do ARBs or ACEIs reduce the risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation compared to nonusers in patients aged ≥55 years with hypertension?
Population
25,075 patients aged ≥55 years with a history of hypertension from the Taiwan National Health Insurance…
Comparison
Angiotensin-receptor blockers or… vs Nonusers in their antihypertensive regimen
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
average 7.7 years
Authors
Loading...
ARBs/ACEIs were associated with lower new-onset AF in hypertension; extends observational data but leaves open need for RCTs before practice change.
Cohort (n=25,075)
Yes
Do ARBs or ACEIs reduce the risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation compared to nonusers in patients aged ≥55 years with hypertension?
Hazard Ratio: 0.51 (95% CI 0.44–0.58)
p-value: p=<0.001
Both ARBs and ACEIs are effective for the primary prevention of atrial fibrillation in hypertensive patients, with ARBs potentially offering greater benefit in those with a history of stroke or TIA.
Hsieh et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in hypertension (n=25,075). Angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARB) vs. nonusers was evaluated on new-onset AF (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.44-0.58, p=<0.001). Both ARB (HR 0.51; 95% CI 0.44-0.58) and ACEI (HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.47-0.59) reduced the risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation compared to nonusers in patients with hypertension.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: