Key result
PARP inhibitors-based therapy significantly increased the risk of any-grade MACEs compared with controls (5.0% vs 3.6%; OR 1.62, P=0.0009), but not high-grade MACEs.
Why the study?
Only few data were available regarding the cardiac and vascular safety profile of PARP inhibitors in patients with solid tumors.
Does PARP inhibitor-based therapy increase the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, hypertension, and thromboembolic events in patients with solid tumors?
Meta-Analysis
Does PARP inhibitor-based therapy increase the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, hypertension, and thromboembolic events in patients with solid tumors?
Odds Ratio: 1.62
Absolute Event Rate: 5% vs 3.6%
p-value: p=0.0009
PARP inhibitors increase the risk of any-grade MACEs, hypertension, and thromboembolic events in patients with solid tumors, but the absolute incidence is low and high-grade events are not significantly increased, suggesting routine cardiovascular monitoring is not needed for asymptomatic patients.
Raises any-grade MACE risk with PARP inhibitors; supports no routine monitoring in asymptomatic patients and extends cardiovascular safety data.
•PARPi-based therapy significantly increases the risk of any-grade MACEs.•The risks of any-grade hypertension and thromboembolic events are also increased.•No significantly increase in high-grade events was observed. BackgroundPoly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi) provided significant antitumor activity in various tumors, mainly carrying deleterious mutations of BRCA1/BRCA2 genes. Only few data are available regarding the cardiac and vascular safety profile of this drug class. We carried out a meta-analysis for assessing the incidence and relative risk (RR) of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), hypertension, and thromboembolic events in patients with solid tumors treated with PARPi-based therapy.MethodsProspective studies were identified by searching the Medline/PubMed, Cochrane Library, and ASCO Meeting abstracts. Data extraction was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Combined odds ratios (ORs), RRs, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using fixed- or random-effects methods, depending on studies heterogeneity. RevMan software for meta-analysis (v.5.2.3) was used to carry out statistical analyses.ResultsThirty-two studies were selected for the final analysis. The incidence of PARPi-related MACEs of any and high grade was 5.0% and 0.9%, respectively, compared with 3.6% and 0.9% in the control arms, corresponding to a significant increased risk of MACEs of any grade (Peto OR 1.62; P = 0.0009) but not of high grade (P = 0.49). The incidence of hypertension of any grade and high grade was 17.5% and 6.0% with PARPi, respectively, compared with 12.6% and 4.4% in the controls. Treatment with PARPi significantly increased the risk of hypertension of any grade (random-effects, RR = 1.53; P = 0.03) but not of high grade (random-effects, RR = 1.47; P = 0.09) compared with controls. Finally, PARPi-based therapies significantly increased the risk of thromboembolic events of any grade (Peto OR = 1.49, P = 0.004) and not of high grade (Peto OR = 1.31; P = 0.13) compared with controls.ConclusionsPARPi-based therapy is associated with a significantly increased risk of MACEs, hypertension, and thromboembolic events of any grade compared with controls. The lack of a significant increased risk of high-grade events together with the absolute low incidence of these adverse events led not to consider routine cardiovascular monitoring as recommended in asymptomatic patients. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi) provided significant antitumor activity in various tumors, mainly carrying deleterious mutations of BRCA1/BRCA2 genes. Only few data are available regarding the cardiac and vascular safety profile of this drug class. We carried out a meta-analysis for assessing the incidence and relative risk (RR) of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), hypertension, and thromboembolic events in patients with solid tumors treated with PARPi-based therapy. Prospective studies were identified by searching the Medline/PubMed, Cochrane Library, and ASCO Meeting abstracts. Data extraction was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Combined odds ratios (ORs), RRs, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using fixed- or random-effects methods, depending on studies heterogeneity. RevMan software for meta-analysis (v.5.2.3) was used to carry out statistical analyses. Thirty-two studies were selected for the final analysis. The incidence of PARPi-related MACEs of any and high grade was 5.0% and 0.9%, respectively, compared with 3.6% and 0.9% in the control arms, corresponding to a significant increased risk of MACEs of any grade (Peto OR 1.62; P = 0.0009) but not of high grade (P = 0.49). The incidence of hypertension of any grade and high grade was 17.5% and 6.0% with PARPi, respectively, compared with 12.6% and 4.4% in the controls. Treatment with PARPi significantly increased the risk of hypertension of any grade (random-effects, RR = 1.53; P = 0.03) but not of high grade (random-effects, RR = 1.47; P = 0.09) compared with controls. Finally, PARPi-based therapies significantly increased the risk of thromboembolic events of any grade (Peto OR = 1.49, P = 0.004) and not of high grade (Peto OR = 1.31; P = 0.13) compared with controls. PARPi-based therapy is associated with a significantly increased risk of MACEs, hypertension, and thromboembolic events of any grade compared with controls. The lack of a significant increased risk of high-grade events together with the absolute low incidence of these adverse events led not to consider routine cardiovascular monitoring as recommended in asymptomatic patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Palazzo et al. (2023) conducted a meta-analysis in Solid tumors. PARP inhibitors-based therapy vs. Controls was evaluated on MACEs of any grade (Peto OR 1.62, p=0.0009). PARP inhibitors-based therapy significantly increased the risk of any-grade MACEs compared with controls (5.0% vs 3.6%; OR 1.62, P=0.0009), but not high-grade MACEs.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: