Key result
Editorial advocates transitioning from static to dynamic risk assessment models for SCD prediction.
Dynamic risk assessment may improve sudden cardiac death prediction over traditional static models; leaves open the need for prospective.
Journal Article A paradigm change in sudden cardiac death risk prediction: 'static' goes out, 'dynamic' comes in Get access Peter J Schwartz, Peter J Schwartz Center for Cardiac Arrhythmias of Genetic Origin and Laboratory of Cardiovascular Genetics, Istituto Auxologico Italiano IRCCS, Via Pier Lombardo, 22, 20135 Milan, Italy Corresponding author. Tel: +39 02 619113408, Fax: +39 02 619113411, Email: p.schwartz@auxologico.it, peter.schwartz@unipv.it https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0367-1048 Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar Paolo Cerea Paolo Cerea Center for Cardiac Arrhythmias of Genetic Origin and Laboratory of Cardiovascular Genetics, Istituto Auxologico Italiano IRCCS, Via Pier Lombardo, 22, 20135 Milan, Italy https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8902-993X Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar European Heart Journal, Volume 45, Issue 10, 7 March 2024, Pages 820–822, https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae051 Published: 06 February 2024
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schwartz et al. (2024) conducted an editorial in Sudden cardiac death. Dynamic risk prediction vs. Static risk prediction was evaluated. This editorial discusses a paradigm shift in sudden cardiac death risk prediction, advocating for the transition from static to dynamic risk assessment models.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: