Key result
Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants are at least as effective as vitamin K antagonists for stroke prevention in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation, with apixaban and edoxaban demonstrating additional clinical net benefit.
Why the study?
Increasing age strongly elevates stroke and bleeding risks in AF, but evidence on the efficacy and safety of oral anticoagulants specifically in patients aged >= 75 years needed summarization.
Do non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants improve clinical net benefit (efficacy vs. bleeding risk) compared to vitamin K antagonists in patients aged ≥75 years with atrial fibrillation?
Do non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants improve clinical net benefit (efficacy vs. bleeding risk) compared to vitamin K antagonists in patients aged ≥75 years with atrial fibrillation?
Apixaban and edoxaban offer the most favorable clinical net benefit for stroke prevention in AF patients aged ≥75 years due to preserved efficacy and reduced major bleeding compared to VKA.
Supports apixaban/edoxaban preference for net benefit in elderly AF; leaves open dedicated RCTs in this population.
Ischaemic stroke and systemic embolism are the major potentially preventable complications of atrial fibrillation (AF) leading to severe morbidity and mortality. Anticoagulation using vitamin K antagonists (VKA) or non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) is mandatory for stroke prevention in AF. Following approval of the four NOACs dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, the use of VKA is declining steadily. Increasing age with thresholds of 65 and 75 years is a strong risk factor when determining annual stroke risk in AF patients. Current recommendations such as the "2016 Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation" of the European Society of Cardiology and the "2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update" by the American College of Cardiology, the American Heart Association, and the Heart Rhythm Society strengthen the importance of anticoagulation and detection of bleeding risks, of which older age is an important one. While patients aged ≥ 75 years are usually underrepresented in randomised clinical trials, they represent almost 40% of the trial populations in the large NOAC approval studies. Therefore, a sufficient amount of data is available to assess the efficacy and safety for this patient cohort in that specific indication. In this article, the evidence for stroke prevention in AF using either VKA or NOACs is summarised with a special focus on efficacy compared to bleeding risk in patients aged ≥ 75 years. Specifically, we used a model of increased weighing of intracranial bleeding to illustrate the potential benefit of NOACs over VKA in the elderly population. In brief, there are at least two tested strategies with apixaban and edoxaban which even confer an additional clinical net benefit compared with VKA. Furthermore, elderly subgroups of trials for combined antithrombotic treatment following percutaneous coronary interventions in anticoagulated patients are analysed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schäfer et al. (2020) conducted a review in Atrial fibrillation. Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) vs. Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) was evaluated. Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants are at least as effective as vitamin K antagonists for stroke prevention in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation, with apixaban and edoxaban demonstrating additional clinical net benefit.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: