Key result
Three months after refeeding following severe food restriction, female rats exhibited predominantly atrophied cardiomyocytes and twice as many ischemia/reperfusion-induced ventricular arrhythmias compared to controls.
Why the study?
While malnutrition acutely affects cardiovascular structure and function, the adverse long-term cardiovascular effects after refeeding remain to be determined.
Does severe food restriction followed by refeeding increase susceptibility to cardiac arrhythmias and adverse cardiac remodeling in female and male rats?
Does severe food restriction followed by refeeding increase susceptibility to cardiac arrhythmias and adverse cardiac remodeling in female and male rats?
Effect estimate: 2-fold increase in females
p-value: p=<0.05
Female rats are more susceptible to long-term adverse cardiovascular effects, including I/R-induced arrhythmias and atrophic remodeling, months after refeeding following severe food restriction.
May signal lasting arrhythmia risk after refeeding in females; hypothesis-generating for sex-specific effects and human translation.
BACKGROUND: Many studies have shown malnutrition and inadequate caloric consumption have adverse acute effects on cardiovascular structure and function. METHODS: To determine the adverse long term cardiovascular effects, we studied cardiac morphology and function in female (F) and male (M) severe food restricted rats 3 months after refeeding (sFR-Refed). RESULTS: Two weeks of a normal chow diet in which calories were reduced by 60% decreased body weight (BW) by approximately 15% in both sexes. Within 2 weeks of refeeding, no differences in BW were detected between CT and sFR-Refed groups. However, male rats gained almost 3 times more BW than the females over the 3-month refeeding period. Sex differences were also observed in cardiac pathology. Hearts from F-sFR-Refed rats exhibited more atrophy and less hypertrophy, while M-sFR-Refed rats predominantly exhibited hypertrophic remodeling. While there were no differences in the frequency of ventricular arrhythmias induced by ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) in the isolated heart between M-CT and M-sFR-Refed rats, I/R induced twice as many arrhythmias in the F-sFR-Refed rats compared to F-CT. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate the female heart is more susceptible to the long term adverse cardiovascular effects of sFR months after refeeding. Thus, this study provides a rationale for studying sex differences in cardiovascular risk in individuals who experience sFR for voluntary (e.g., very low-calorie dieting) or involuntary (e.g., poverty) reasons earlier in life.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Souza et al. (2022) studied Severe food restriction and refeeding (n=34). Severe food restriction followed by refeeding vs. Normal diet ad libitum was evaluated on Frequency of ventricular arrhythmias induced by ischemia/reperfusion (2-fold increase in females, p=<0.05). Three months after refeeding following severe food restriction, female rats exhibited predominantly atrophied cardiomyocytes and twice as many ischemia/reperfusion-induced ventricular arrhythmias compared to controls.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: