Key result
Taiwanese healthcare infrastructure had fewer cardiologists per million population than Europe (57.4 vs 72.8) but higher accessibility to ICD (3.4 vs 1.6 centers) and CRT (3.0 vs 1.5 centers).
Why the study?
To evaluate local cardiology infrastructure and services for heart failure care in Taiwan hospitals and compare them with hospitals in European countries.
Cross-Sectional (n=98)
Yes
Absolute Event Rate: 57.4% vs 72.8%
Taiwan exhibits distinct cardiology workforce distributions and higher device therapy accessibility compared to Europe, with significant service variations between hospitals with and without dedicated HF care teams.
Lower cardiologist density with higher device access in Taiwan; leaves open optimal workforce models for outcomes research.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The present study was designed to evaluate the local cardiology infrastructure and services for heart failure (HF) care in Taiwan hospitals and to compare the HF care with the hospitals in European countries. METHODS: Available data from a total of 98 medical centers and regional hospitals in Taiwan were analyzed. Each facility was given a single copy of the questionnaire between September and December 2019, and service records were extracted from the National Health Insurance Database. European data were adopted from the 2017 European Society of Cardiology Atlas. RESULTS: The number of cardiologists per million populations in Taiwan was 57.4, and it was lower than the European median (72.8). The median percentages of interventional and electrophysiologists among cardiologists were 64% and 15% in Taiwan, which were both higher than the European median values (12% and 5%, respectively). The accessibility rates to implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in Taiwan were both higher (3.4 and 3.0 centers per million populations) comparing to those in European countries (median 1.6 and 1.5 centers per million populations). Comparing to 67 hospitals without HF care teams in Taiwan, 31 hospitals (31.6%) with HF teams have significantly more cardiology staff, enhanced procedural capabilities with more alternatives on oral or intravenous HF relevant medications. CONCLUSION: Our analysis clearly demonstrated discrepancies in cardiology subspecialties and CRT/ICD accessibilities between European countries and Taiwan. Variations in HF-focused services and facilities plus HF-directed medications have demonstrated significant differences among Taiwanese hospitals with or without HF care team.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chang et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Heart failure (n=98). Taiwanese healthcare infrastructure vs. European healthcare infrastructure was evaluated on Cardiologists per million populations. Taiwanese healthcare infrastructure had fewer cardiologists per million population than Europe (57.4 vs 72.8) but higher accessibility to ICD (3.4 vs 1.6 centers) and CRT (3.0 vs 1.5 centers).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: