Why the study?
What is the measurement variability and reproducibility of Doppler echocardiography parameters in dogs?
What is the measurement variability and reproducibility of Doppler echocardiography parameters in dogs?
Differences greater than 20% for serial echocardiographic scans in dogs must be achieved to document genuine change, and variability is minimized when a single experienced operator acquires and measures serial scans.
Changes >20% may indicate genuine serial differences in dogs; leaves open translation to human echocardiography.
Serial Doppler echocardiographic examinations were carried out in random order on six boxer dogs, on 3 separate days, by two experienced Doppler echocardiographers, to assess measurement variability and reproducibility of 65 parameters. Large numbers of parameters exhibited significant differences for each of the categories of intraobserver, interobserver, interday and interoperator. The coefficients of variation for all parameters measured ranged from 5.03 to 46.43%, but most were less than 20%. In general, least variation was found for the intraobserver category, and the best reproducibility for M-mode and left ventricular volumetric data. The worst reproducibility was found for tricuspid inflow and pulmonary venous flow measurements. The results of this study suggest differences greater than 20% for serial scans must be achieved to document genuine change, although the specific data should be consulted. Furthermore, variability and reproducibility are improved if a single experienced operator/observer acquires and measures serial scans.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dukes‐McEwan et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: